NYM vs. CERY
NYM (AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF) and CERY (SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NYM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while CERY is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Total Return Index. NYM is actively managed, while CERY is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. NYM charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for CERY.
Performance
NYM vs. CERY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NYM achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than CERY's 18.11% return.
NYM
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CERY
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -9.49%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 6M
- 16.37%
- 1Y
- 27.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NYM vs. CERY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.55% | 0.47% |
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 18.11% | 2.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NYM and CERY is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NYM vs. CERY — Risk / Return Rank
NYM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CERY
NYM vs. CERY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (CERY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NYM | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.21 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NYM vs. CERY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum CERY drawdown of -12.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and CERY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NYM | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -12.44% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -12.44% | +12.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -2.29% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.76% | — |
Volatility
NYM vs. CERY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NYM | CERY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03% | 15.66% | -13.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 14.74% | -12.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.03% | 14.74% | -12.71% |
NYM vs. CERY - Expense Ratio Comparison
NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than CERY's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
NYM vs. CERY - Dividend Comparison
NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than CERY's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
CERY SPDR Bloomberg Enhanced Roll Yield Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.23% | 4.99% | 0.52% |
NYM AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF | 1.73% | 0.49% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NYM and CERY have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NYM is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NYM is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for CERY.
CERY has the higher dividend yield at 4.23%, compared with 1.73% for NYM.
NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while CERY is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.28% for CERY.
Find the right allocation for NYM and CERY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer