PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NYM vs. BPH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NYM vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NYM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BPH

1D
1.20%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NYM vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between NYM and BPH is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NYM vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF (NYM) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NYM vs. BPH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NYMBPHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.63

9.48

-7.85

Drawdowns

NYM vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NYM drawdown since its inception was -1.76%, smaller than the maximum BPH drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NYM and BPH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NYMBPHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-2.35%

+0.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

0.00%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.42%

-1.08%

+0.66%

Volatility

NYM vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NYMBPHDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06%

25.75%

-23.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.06%

25.75%

-23.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

25.75%

-23.69%

NYM vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

NYM has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NYM vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

NYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
BPH
BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF
0.00%0.00%
NYM
AB New York Intermediate Municipal ETF
1.73%0.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


NYM and BPH have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for NYM.

NYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

NYM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for NYM and 0.19% for BPH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NYM and BPH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer