NXUS vs. GRNB
NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and GRNB (VanEck Green Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - NXUS tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged) while GRNB tracks the S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for GRNB.
Performance
NXUS vs. GRNB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 1.52% return, which is significantly higher than GRNB's 0.97% return.
NXUS
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- YTD
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GRNB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 0.89%
- 1Y
- 4.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 0.86%
- 10Y*
- —
NXUS vs. GRNB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.52% | 0.45% |
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF | 0.97% | 0.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between NXUS and GRNB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.72 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NXUS vs. GRNB — Risk / Return Rank
NXUS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GRNB
NXUS vs. GRNB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and VanEck Green Bond ETF (GRNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NXUS | GRNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.66 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.39 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NXUS vs. GRNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum GRNB drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and GRNB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NXUS | GRNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.81% | -18.08% | +15.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.24% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.04% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.90% | -4.55% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.65% | — |
Volatility
NXUS vs. GRNB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NXUS | GRNB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.41% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.71% | 2.98% | +0.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 4.92% | -1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 4.86% | -1.15% |
NXUS vs. GRNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNB's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NXUS vs. GRNB - Dividend Comparison
NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than GRNB's 4.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRNB VanEck Green Bond ETF | 4.22% | 4.18% | 3.83% | 3.17% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.24% | 1.79% | 1.21% | 1.09% |
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF | 1.65% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NXUS and GRNB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for GRNB.
GRNB has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 1.65% for NXUS.
NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while GRNB tracks S&P Green Bond U.S. Dollar Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.20% for GRNB.
Find the right allocation for NXUS and GRNB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer