NXUS vs. BGRN

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

NXUS (Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF) and BGRN (iShares USD Green Bond ETF) are both Global Bonds funds - NXUS tracks the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged) while BGRN tracks the Bloomberg MSCI USD Green Bond Select Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NXUS charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for BGRN.

Performance

NXUS vs. BGRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXUS achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly higher than BGRN's 0.19% return.

NXUS

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 0.26%
• YTD: 0.48%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BGRN

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: -0.12%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.40%
• 1Y: 4.86%
• 3Y*: 4.66%
• 5Y*: 0.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXUS vs. BGRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	0.48%	0.61%
BGRN iShares USD Green Bond ETF	0.19%	1.08%

Correlation

The correlation between NXUS and BGRN is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025	0.74

Return for Risk

NXUS vs. BGRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGRN

BGRN Risk / Return Rank: 47
BGRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BGRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
BGRN Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BGRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
BGRN Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXUS vs. BGRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF (NXUS) and iShares USD Green Bond ETF (BGRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NXUS	BGRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	0.44	-0.02

Drawdowns

NXUS vs. BGRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXUS drawdown since its inception was -2.81%, smaller than the maximum BGRN drawdown of -19.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXUS and BGRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXUS	BGRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.81%	-19.16%	+16.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-2.23%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-4.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	-1.07%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.91%	-5.79%	+4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.67%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NXUS	BGRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	2.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.73%	2.96%	+0.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.73%	5.46%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.73%	5.00%	-1.27%

NXUS vs. BGRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXUS has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BGRN's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

NXUS vs. BGRN - Dividend Comparison

NXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than BGRN's 4.30% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BGRN iShares USD Green Bond ETF	4.30%	4.21%	4.07%	3.52%	2.66%	0.78%	1.82%	3.66%	0.21%
NXUS Nuveen International Aggregate Bond ETF	1.67%	0.39%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXUS and BGRN in my portfolio?

NXUS and BGRN have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NXUS or BGRN?

On fees, NXUS is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXUS or BGRN?

NXUS is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for BGRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXUS or BGRN?

BGRN has the higher dividend yield at 4.30%, compared with 1.67% for NXUS.

What is the main difference between NXUS and BGRN?

NXUS tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Index (USD Hedged), while BGRN tracks Bloomberg MSCI USD Green Bond Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for NXUS and 0.20% for BGRN.