BGRN vs. GRNB
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB).
BGRN and GRNB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BGRN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI Green Bond Select USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. GRNB is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S&P Green Bond Select Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2017. Both BGRN and GRNB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGRN or GRNB.
Correlation
The correlation between BGRN and GRNB is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
BGRN vs. GRNB - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGRN:
1.55
GRNB:
1.70
BGRN:
2.25
GRNB:
2.58
BGRN:
1.27
GRNB:
1.31
BGRN:
0.57
GRNB:
0.74
BGRN:
4.96
GRNB:
6.05
BGRN:
1.37%
GRNB:
1.15%
BGRN:
4.37%
GRNB:
4.11%
BGRN:
-19.16%
GRNB:
-18.08%
BGRN:
-5.54%
GRNB:
-2.72%
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with BGRN at 2.27% and GRNB at 2.27%.
BGRN
2.27%
0.62%
1.77%
7.31%
0.00%
N/A
GRNB
2.27%
0.52%
1.79%
7.44%
0.48%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGRN vs. GRNB - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BGRN and GRNB have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGRN vs. GRNB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGRN
GRNB
BGRN vs. GRNB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGRN vs. GRNB - Dividend Comparison
BGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than GRNB's 3.91% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRN iShares Global Green Bond ETF | 4.14% | 4.07% | 3.52% | 2.66% | 0.78% | 1.82% | 3.66% | 0.21% | 0.00% |
GRNB VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF | 3.91% | 3.83% | 3.17% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.24% | 1.79% | 1.21% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
BGRN vs. GRNB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, which is greater than GRNB's maximum drawdown of -18.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRN and GRNB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGRN vs. GRNB - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to VanEck Vectors Green Bond ETF (GRNB) at 1.93%. This indicates that BGRN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.