BGRN vs. BND
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND).
BGRN and BND are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BGRN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays MSCI Green Bond Select USD Hedged Index. It was launched on Nov 13, 2018. BND is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both BGRN and BND are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BGRN or BND.
Correlation
The correlation between BGRN and BND is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BGRN vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BGRN:
1.53
BND:
1.26
BGRN:
2.22
BND:
1.84
BGRN:
1.27
BND:
1.22
BGRN:
0.53
BND:
0.49
BGRN:
4.62
BND:
3.20
BGRN:
1.37%
BND:
2.05%
BGRN:
4.14%
BND:
5.20%
BGRN:
-19.16%
BND:
-18.84%
BGRN:
-5.12%
BND:
-6.13%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRN achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 3.55% return.
BGRN
2.72%
0.55%
0.84%
6.16%
0.42%
N/A
BND
3.55%
0.82%
0.71%
6.48%
-0.31%
1.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGRN vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRN has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BGRN vs. BND — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BGRN
BND
BGRN vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BGRN vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
BGRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, more than BND's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRN iShares Global Green Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.07% | 3.52% | 2.66% | 0.78% | 1.82% | 3.66% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.66% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 1.97% | 2.22% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
BGRN vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRN drawdown since its inception was -19.16%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRN and BND. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BGRN vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Green Bond ETF (BGRN) is 0.84%, while Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) has a volatility of 1.31%. This indicates that BGRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.