PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG vs. BOTZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 55.82% return, which is significantly higher than BOTZ's 12.17% return.


NXTG

1D
2.85%
1M
23.47%
YTD
55.82%
6M
57.49%
1Y
85.72%
3Y*
35.94%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
18.04%

BOTZ

1D
0.10%
1M
5.28%
YTD
12.17%
6M
16.12%
1Y
32.12%
3Y*
13.31%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
55.82%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-17.25%28.02%
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
12.17%14.17%12.26%38.97%-42.69%8.65%51.92%31.80%-28.34%58.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and BOTZ is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.78

The correlation between NXTG and BOTZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTG
BOTZ

Technology

66.1%
31.8%

Communication Services

21.7%
4.5%

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Industrials

4.3%
48.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%
6.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

0.0%

Energy

-

0.5%

Financial Services

-

0.9%

Healthcare

-

9.0%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

NXTG
66.1%
BOTZ
31.8%

Communication Services

NXTG
21.7%
BOTZ
4.5%

Real Estate

NXTG
7.5%
BOTZ

-

Industrials

NXTG
4.3%
BOTZ
48.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NXTG
0.4%
BOTZ
6.1%

Basic Materials

NXTG

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

NXTG

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Energy

NXTG

-

BOTZ
0.5%

Financial Services

NXTG

-

BOTZ
0.9%

Healthcare

NXTG

-

BOTZ
9.0%

Utilities

NXTG

-

BOTZ
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG vs. BOTZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

BOTZ
BOTZ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BOTZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOTZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOTZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BOTZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOTZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTGBOTZDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.68

1.35

+3.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.85

2.00

+3.85

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.23

+0.57

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.51

1.68

+6.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.39

5.76

+27.62

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG Sharpe Ratio is 4.68, which is higher than the BOTZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG and BOTZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTGBOTZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68

1.35

+3.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.14

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.45

+0.25

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum BOTZ drawdown of -55.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and BOTZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTGBOTZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-55.54%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-19.34%

+9.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-29.02%

+11.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-55.54%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.38%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-18.33%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

5.62%

-3.00%

Volatility

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Volatility Comparison

First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF (BOTZ) at 7.72%. This indicates that NXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOTZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTGBOTZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

7.72%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

18.38%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

23.96%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

26.73%

-8.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

25.73%

-6.85%

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BOTZ's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG vs. BOTZ - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than BOTZ's 0.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOTZ
Global X Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic ETF
0.58%0.66%0.13%0.20%0.23%0.16%0.19%0.83%1.44%0.01%0.06%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.10%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG and BOTZ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to BOTZ (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs BOTZ's -55.54%.

On 5-year performance, NXTG leads with 19.71% vs 3.73% for BOTZ. On fees, BOTZ is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, BOTZ has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 19.71% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BOTZ is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.58% for BOTZ.

NXTG is categorized as Technology Equities, while BOTZ is Robotics. NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while BOTZ tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.68% for BOTZ.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG and BOTZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer