PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. VOLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. VOLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 33.00% return, which is significantly lower than VOLT's 41.30% return.


NXTE

1D
-0.59%
1M
7.18%
YTD
33.00%
6M
31.22%
1Y
51.11%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
10Y*

VOLT

1D
0.71%
1M
3.23%
YTD
41.30%
6M
38.97%
1Y
64.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. VOLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
33.00%21.84%-7.15%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
41.30%25.92%-8.98%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and VOLT is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024

0.71

The correlation between NXTE and VOLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

NXTE vs. VOLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTE
VOLT

Technology

53.6%
12.9%

Industrials

15.7%
47.0%

Real Estate

10.1%

-

Healthcare

10.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.7%
3.4%

Utilities

2.1%
31.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.8%

-

Communication Services

1.6%

-

Financial Services

1.3%
0.5%

Basic Materials

0.5%

-

Energy

-

4.7%

Technology

NXTE
53.6%
VOLT
12.9%

Industrials

NXTE
15.7%
VOLT
47.0%

Real Estate

NXTE
10.1%
VOLT

-

Healthcare

NXTE
10.0%
VOLT

-

Consumer Cyclical

NXTE
3.7%
VOLT
3.4%

Utilities

NXTE
2.1%
VOLT
31.0%

Consumer Defensive

NXTE
1.8%
VOLT

-

Communication Services

NXTE
1.6%
VOLT

-

Financial Services

NXTE
1.3%
VOLT
0.5%

Basic Materials

NXTE
0.5%
VOLT

-

Energy

NXTE

-

VOLT
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. VOLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

VOLT
VOLT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VOLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOLT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VOLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOLT Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. VOLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NXTEVOLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.76

6.73

-2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.56

18.83

-7.27

NXTE vs. VOLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is lower than the VOLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and VOLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. VOLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than VOLT's maximum drawdown of -23.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and VOLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTEVOLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-23.40%

-5.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-9.59%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.75%

-2.81%

-2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-5.14%

-2.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

3.42%

+1.02%

Volatility

NXTE vs. VOLT - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 14.81% compared to Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) at 9.34%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTEVOLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.81%

9.34%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

18.28%

+4.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.71%

21.74%

+5.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.70%

24.53%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.70%

24.53%

+2.17%

NXTE vs. VOLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than VOLT's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. VOLT - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than VOLT's 0.32% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.38%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%
VOLT
Tema Electrification ETF
0.32%0.46%0.01%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and VOLT have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (14.81%) compared to VOLT (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs VOLT's -23.40%.

On 1-year performance, VOLT leads with 64.21% vs 51.11% for NXTE. On fees, VOLT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, VOLT has been the lower-risk option at 9.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VOLT has performed better with a 64.21% return vs 51.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOLT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

NXTE has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.32% for VOLT.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tema. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.75% for VOLT.

VOLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and VOLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer