PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTE vs. MQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly lower than MQQQ's 37.15% return.


NXTE

1D
-0.69%
1M
14.44%
YTD
35.18%
6M
33.52%
1Y
62.19%
3Y*
18.45%
5Y*
10Y*

MQQQ

1D
-0.89%
1M
16.22%
YTD
37.15%
6M
33.30%
1Y
77.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
35.18%21.84%1.62%
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
37.15%31.67%19.72%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and MQQQ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

0.77

The correlation between NXTE and MQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTE vs. MQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE
NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTEMQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.57

3.08

+1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.64

11.06

+3.58

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the MQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and MQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTEMQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.41

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

1.29

-0.63

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum MQQQ drawdown of -42.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and MQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTEMQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.64%

-42.16%

+13.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.68%

-25.23%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-1.56%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

-7.15%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.26%

7.00%

-2.74%

Volatility

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) at 8.51%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTEMQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.29%

8.51%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

24.48%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.52%

32.18%

-7.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.98%

43.18%

-17.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.98%

43.18%

-17.20%

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than MQQQ's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTE vs. MQQQ - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than MQQQ's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.47%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%
NXTE
Axs Green Alpha ETF
0.37%0.36%0.52%0.76%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTE and MQQQ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTE has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to MQQQ (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs MQQQ's -42.16%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 77.21% vs 62.19% for NXTE. On fees, NXTE is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 77.21% return vs 62.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NXTE is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while MQQQ is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 1.30% for MQQQ.

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTE and MQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer