NXTE vs. LENS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and LENS (Sarmaya Thematic ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NXTE returned 64.20% vs 61.82% for LENS. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LENS.

Performance

NXTE vs. LENS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 36.11% return, which is significantly higher than LENS's 13.33% return.

NXTE

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 17.52%
• YTD: 36.11%
• 6M: 34.91%
• 1Y: 64.20%
• 3Y*: 18.63%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LENS

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: -1.68%
• YTD: 13.33%
• 6M: 18.33%
• 1Y: 61.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTE vs. LENS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	36.11%	18.91%
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	13.33%	56.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and LENS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

NXTE vs. LENS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 79
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 71
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 79

LENS

LENS Risk / Return Rank: 67
LENS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
LENS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
LENS Omega Ratio Rank: 68
LENS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
LENS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTE vs. LENS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NXTE	LENS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.34	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	2.70	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.72	4.02	+0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.12	10.02	+5.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NXTE vs. LENS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the LENS Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and LENS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NXTE	LENS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.63	2.34	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	2.09	-1.42

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. LENS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, which is greater than LENS's maximum drawdown of -15.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and LENS.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTE	LENS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-15.47%	-13.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.68%	-15.47%	+1.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-13.64%	+13.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.88%	-3.71%	-4.17%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	6.19%	-1.93%

Volatility

NXTE vs. LENS - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 9.27% compared to Sarmaya Thematic ETF (LENS) at 6.16%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LENS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTE	LENS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	6.16%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.29%	22.07%	-2.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	26.54%	-2.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.99%	25.49%	+0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.99%	25.49%	+0.50%

NXTE vs. LENS - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than LENS's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTE vs. LENS - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than LENS's 1.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF	1.41%	1.60%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.37%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTE and LENS in my portfolio?

NXTE and LENS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTE or LENS?

NXTE has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to LENS (6.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs LENS's -15.47%.

Which ETF is better, NXTE or LENS?

On 1-year performance, NXTE leads with 64.20% vs 61.82% for LENS. On fees, LENS is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, LENS has been the lower-risk option at 6.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTE or LENS?

Over the 1-year period, NXTE has performed better with a 64.20% return vs 61.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTE or LENS?

LENS is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTE or LENS?

LENS has the higher dividend yield at 1.41%, compared with 0.37% for NXTE.

What is the main difference between NXTE and LENS?

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Sarmaya Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.79% for LENS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NXTE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.