NXTE vs. BOAT

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

NXTE (Axs Green Alpha ETF) and BOAT (SonicShares Global Shipping ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NXTE is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AXS, while BOAT is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Global Shipping Index. NXTE is actively managed, while BOAT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NXTE returned 14.45%/yr vs 26.76%/yr for BOAT. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NXTE charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for BOAT.

Performance

NXTE vs. BOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTE achieves a 22.67% return, which is significantly lower than BOAT's 44.44% return.

NXTE

• 1D: 4.31%
• 1M: -7.16%
• 6M: 12.96%
• YTD: 22.67%
• 1Y: 38.44%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.33%

BOAT

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 12.97%
• 6M: 26.12%
• YTD: 44.44%
• 1Y: 56.33%
• 3Y*: 26.76%
• 5Y*: 24.35%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 24.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	$1.71M	$1.08M	$1.05M
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	$193.74K	$136.30K	$197.70K

NXTE vs. BOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	22.67%	21.84%	-3.42%	13.85%	-1.52%
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	44.44%	22.77%	5.97%	24.53%	13.97%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTE and BOAT is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2022	0.38

The correlation between NXTE and BOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXTE vs. BOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NXTE	BOAT
Technology	53.1%	-
Industrials	13.5%	29.2%
Real Estate	13.3%	-
Healthcare	9.4%	-
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	-
Utilities	2.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.1%	-
Communication Services	1.8%	-
Basic Materials	0.5%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	6.6%
Energy	0.2%	10.3%

Return for Risk

NXTE vs. BOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NXTE

NXTE Risk / Return Rank: 45
NXTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
NXTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
NXTE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
NXTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
NXTE Martin Ratio Rank: 51

BOAT

BOAT Risk / Return Rank: 91
BOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
BOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
BOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 89
BOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NXTE vs. BOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) and SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NXTE	BOAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	2.74	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.82	3.59	-1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.44	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.88	-3.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.58	13.77	-7.19

NXTE vs. BOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the BOAT Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTE and BOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NXTE vs. BOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTE drawdown since its inception was -28.64%, smaller than the maximum BOAT drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTE and BOAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NXTE	BOAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.64%	-33.94%	+5.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.50%	-11.60%	-9.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.24%	-33.94%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.37%	-0.97%	-12.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.92%	-9.50%	+1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.86%	4.10%	+1.76%

Volatility

NXTE vs. BOAT - Volatility Comparison

Axs Green Alpha ETF (NXTE) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to SonicShares Global Shipping ETF (BOAT) at 6.47%. This indicates that NXTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NXTE	BOAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	6.47%	+5.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.27%	16.87%	+9.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	30.51%	20.69%	+9.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.24%	25.05%	+2.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.24%	25.05%	+2.19%

NXTE vs. BOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTE has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BOAT's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

NXTE vs. BOAT - Dividend Comparison

NXTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than BOAT's 6.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BOAT SonicShares Global Shipping ETF	6.37%	8.08%	13.89%	13.65%	13.57%	1.36%
NXTE Axs Green Alpha ETF	0.54%	0.36%	0.52%	0.76%	0.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NXTE and BOAT in my portfolio?

NXTE and BOAT have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NXTE or BOAT?

NXTE has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to BOAT (6.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTE dropped -28.64% vs BOAT's -33.94%.

Which ETF is better, NXTE or BOAT?

On 3-year performance, BOAT leads with 26.76% vs 14.45% for NXTE. On fees, BOAT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, BOAT has been the lower-risk option at 6.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NXTE or BOAT?

Over the 3-year period, BOAT has performed better with a 26.76% return vs 14.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NXTE or BOAT?

BOAT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for NXTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NXTE or BOAT?

BOAT has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 0.54% for NXTE.

What is the main difference between NXTE and BOAT?

NXTE is categorized as Global Equities, while BOAT is Industrials Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tidal. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for NXTE and 0.69% for BOAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BOAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.