NWLG vs. IBIC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NWLG (Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NWLG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Nuveen, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. NWLG is actively managed, while IBIC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. NWLG charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.

Performance

NWLG vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

NWLG

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBIC

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 2.37%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWLG vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NWLG Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF	-10.63%	13.21%	29.17%	14.31%
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	2.37%	4.96%	5.25%	2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between NWLG and IBIC is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2023	-0.08

The correlation between NWLG and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

NWLG vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBIC

IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 98
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWLG vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWLG	IBIC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	3.49	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	NWLG	IBIC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.90%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.13%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.10%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.07%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NWLG	IBIC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.90%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	1.58%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	1.58%	—

NWLG vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWLG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWLG vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

NWLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF	3.59%	4.43%	4.65%	0.83%
NWLG Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF	15.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWLG and IBIC in my portfolio?

NWLG and IBIC have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NWLG or IBIC?

On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NWLG or IBIC?

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NWLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NWLG or IBIC?

NWLG has the higher dividend yield at 15.71%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

What is the main difference between NWLG and IBIC?

NWLG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for NWLG and 0.10% for IBIC.