PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWLG vs. HLAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWLG vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NWLG

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HLAL

1D
-0.07%
1M
9.45%
YTD
18.72%
6M
17.75%
1Y
43.63%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
15.86%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWLG vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
NWLG
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF
-10.63%13.21%29.17%43.55%-31.52%5.24%
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
18.72%18.30%16.70%30.13%-17.56%11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between NWLG and HLAL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2021

0.87

The correlation between NWLG and HLAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NWLG vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NWLG
HLAL

Technology

48.0%
50.4%

Communication Services

14.7%
16.7%

Industrials

12.4%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
5.6%

Healthcare

6.7%
10.5%

Financial Services

5.9%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

1.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.0%
2.5%

Energy

-

4.5%

Real Estate

-

0.8%

Utilities

-

1.0%

Technology

NWLG
48.0%
HLAL
50.4%

Communication Services

NWLG
14.7%
HLAL
16.7%

Industrials

NWLG
12.4%
HLAL
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

NWLG
10.3%
HLAL
5.6%

Healthcare

NWLG
6.7%
HLAL
10.5%

Financial Services

NWLG
5.9%
HLAL
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

NWLG
1.0%
HLAL
2.9%

Basic Materials

NWLG
1.0%
HLAL
2.5%

Energy

NWLG

-

HLAL
4.5%

Real Estate

NWLG

-

HLAL
0.8%

Utilities

NWLG

-

HLAL
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWLG vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWLG

HLAL
HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWLG vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF (NWLG) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NWLG vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NWLGHLALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

Drawdowns

NWLG vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWLGHLALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

Volatility

NWLG vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWLGHLALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.21%

NWLG vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWLG has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWLG vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

NWLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.71%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
HLAL
Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF
0.44%0.53%0.58%0.72%1.15%0.78%0.97%0.72%
NWLG
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG ETF
15.71%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWLG and HLAL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for NWLG.

NWLG has the higher dividend yield at 15.71%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

They also come from different issuers: Nuveen and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.64% for NWLG and 0.50% for HLAL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWLG and HLAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer