NWJJX vs. QDIBX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX).
NWJJX is managed by Nationwide. It was launched on Feb 15, 1984. QDIBX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 13, 2019.
Performance
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | -0.39% | 6.71% | 1.86% | 5.28% | -13.82% | -1.55% | 8.26% | -0.03% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 0.00% | 7.72% | 1.66% | 6.71% | -14.11% | -0.17% | 6.77% | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
NWJJX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.77%
- YTD
- -0.39%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
QDIBX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWJJX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than QDIBX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NWJJX vs. QDIBX — Risk / Return Rank
NWJJX
QDIBX
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) and Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NWJJX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 1.55 | -0.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.19 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.81 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 5.30 | -1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NWJJX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 1.06 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.06 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.17 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between NWJJX and QDIBX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Dividend Comparison
NWJJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than QDIBX's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWJJX Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund | 3.82% | 4.14% | 4.10% | 3.09% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 5.17% | 3.30% | 2.60% | 2.16% | 3.12% | 2.42% |
QDIBX Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans | 3.50% | 3.50% | 3.55% | 3.65% | 2.51% | 1.80% | 3.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWJJX drawdown since its inception was -18.99%, roughly equal to the maximum QDIBX drawdown of -19.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWJJX and QDIBX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWJJX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.99% | -19.63% | +0.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.79% | -2.58% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.78% | -19.63% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -1.76% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.11% | -6.52% | +2.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.88% | +0.12% |
Volatility
NWJJX vs. QDIBX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Loomis Core Bond Fund (NWJJX) has a higher volatility of 1.54% compared to Fisher Investments Institutional Group Fixed Income Fund for Retirement Plans (QDIBX) at 1.46%. This indicates that NWJJX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDIBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NWJJX | QDIBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.54% | 1.46% | +0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.58% | 2.54% | +0.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.40% | 4.32% | +0.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.82% | 6.58% | -0.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 6.32% | -1.48% |