PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWISX vs. FRQKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


NWISX

1D
1.12%
1M
1.01%
6M
6.19%
YTD
7.84%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
7.31%
ALL TIME*
5.86%

FRQKX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
7.84%14.63%8.73%15.11%-16.85%11.16%12.13%3.24%
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
3.66%9.91%4.42%8.62%-12.30%3.95%9.68%3.94%

Correlation

The correlation between NWISX and FRQKX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019

0.84

The correlation between NWISX and FRQKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWISX vs. FRQKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NWISX
NWISX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
NWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
NWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQKX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K (FRQKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWISXFRQKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.27

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWISXFRQKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.41%

Volatility

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWISXFRQKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.81%

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWISX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQKX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWISX vs. FRQKX - Dividend Comparison

NWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than FRQKX's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRQKX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K
2.96%3.09%2.91%2.86%5.12%6.11%3.61%2.57%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
6.91%7.48%13.04%7.29%3.01%9.66%5.40%6.21%11.67%7.96%7.01%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWISX and FRQKX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWISX and FRQKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer