PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NWISX vs. NWHVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWISX achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than NWHVX's -5.23% return. Over the past 10 years, NWISX has underperformed NWHVX with an annualized return of 7.80%, while NWHVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.


NWISX

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.13%
YTD
6.60%
6M
6.22%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
7.80%

NWHVX

1D
-1.07%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-5.23%
6M
-6.54%
1Y
-9.41%
3Y*
4.63%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
8.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
6.60%14.63%8.73%15.11%-16.85%11.16%12.13%17.47%-7.35%14.17%
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
-5.23%-2.38%9.89%23.84%-28.32%25.03%31.17%29.96%-2.97%23.11%

Correlation

The correlation between NWISX and NWHVX is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013

0.86

The correlation between NWISX and NWHVX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NWISX vs. NWHVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWISX
NWISX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NWISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWISX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
NWISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWISX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

NWHVX
NWHVX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
NWHVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NWHVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
NWHVX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
NWHVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
NWHVX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NWISXNWHVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.92

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

-0.48

+3.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

-1.03

+13.52

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the NWHVX Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWISX and NWHVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWISX drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than NWHVX's maximum drawdown of -37.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWISX and NWHVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NWISXNWHVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-37.12%

-12.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.12%

-17.82%

+11.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.79%

-19.80%

+11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-37.12%

+8.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.31%

-37.12%

+8.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-14.22%

+13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.91%

-7.85%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

8.29%

-6.93%

Volatility

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) is 3.10%, while Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund (NWHVX) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that NWISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NWHVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NWISXNWHVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

4.74%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

11.79%

-5.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.96%

14.84%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.47%

19.93%

-8.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.90%

19.71%

-7.81%

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWISX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than NWHVX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

NWISX vs. NWHVX - Dividend Comparison

NWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, less than NWHVX's 8.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NWHVX
Nationwide Geneva Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.40%7.96%11.93%16.14%36.45%34.64%6.16%18.85%38.53%11.37%8.97%13.54%
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
6.81%7.48%13.04%7.29%3.01%9.66%5.40%6.21%11.67%7.96%7.01%5.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


NWISX and NWHVX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NWHVX has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to NWISX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWISX dropped -49.97% vs NWHVX's -37.12%.

NWISX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NWISX and NWHVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer