PortfoliosLab logo
NWISX vs. DGRO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between NWISX and DGRO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

NWISX vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NWISX:

0.01

DGRO:

0.78

Sortino Ratio

NWISX:

0.02

DGRO:

1.12

Omega Ratio

NWISX:

1.00

DGRO:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

NWISX:

-0.03

DGRO:

0.79

Martin Ratio

NWISX:

-0.09

DGRO:

3.10

Ulcer Index

NWISX:

7.05%

DGRO:

3.57%

Daily Std Dev

NWISX:

12.83%

DGRO:

15.20%

Max Drawdown

NWISX:

-50.24%

DGRO:

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

NWISX:

-13.23%

DGRO:

-3.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWISX achieves a 4.02% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, NWISX has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 0.69%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.38% annualized return.


NWISX

YTD

4.02%

1M

3.03%

6M

-7.54%

1Y

-0.50%

3Y*

1.87%

5Y*

3.17%

10Y*

0.69%

DGRO

YTD

1.76%

1M

3.53%

6M

-3.30%

1Y

10.31%

3Y*

9.13%

5Y*

13.13%

10Y*

11.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund

iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF

NWISX vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWISX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NWISX vs. DGRO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWISX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NWISX is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NWISX is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NWISX is 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NWISX is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NWISX is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NWISX is 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of DGRO is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of DGRO is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of DGRO is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NWISX vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NWISX Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWISX and DGRO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NWISX vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

NWISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.63%, more than DGRO's 2.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NWISX
Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund
12.63%13.05%7.33%3.00%9.66%5.39%9.30%11.67%9.00%8.14%5.83%9.48%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
2.23%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%0.97%

Drawdowns

NWISX vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWISX drawdown since its inception was -50.24%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWISX and DGRO.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NWISX vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Destination 2030 Fund (NWISX) is 2.34%, while iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that NWISX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...