NWHQX vs. CCOYX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NWHQX (Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund) and CCOYX (Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class) are both Technology Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NWHQX returned 16.87%/yr vs 27.23%/yr for CCOYX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NWHQX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CCOYX.

Performance

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NWHQX achieves a 25.03% return, which is significantly lower than CCOYX's 58.87% return.

NWHQX

• 1D: 1.14%
• 1M: 19.26%
• YTD: 25.03%
• 6M: 25.66%
• 1Y: 43.21%
• 3Y*: 31.35%
• 5Y*: 16.87%
• 10Y*: 21.60%

CCOYX

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: 15.59%
• YTD: 58.87%
• 6M: 55.61%
• 1Y: 127.06%
• 3Y*: 48.12%
• 5Y*: 27.23%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund	25.03%	18.58%	26.23%	63.66%	-37.23%	19.21%	50.97%	38.91%	-3.16%	23.61%
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class	58.87%	37.79%	27.11%	44.77%	-30.92%	39.45%	44.92%	54.68%	-7.78%	19.33%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHQX and CCOYX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2017	0.92

The correlation between NWHQX and CCOYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWHQX vs. CCOYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHQX

NWHQX Risk / Return Rank: 38
NWHQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
NWHQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
NWHQX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
NWHQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
NWHQX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

CCOYX

CCOYX Risk / Return Rank: 97
CCOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
CCOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
CCOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CCOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CCOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) and Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWHQX	CCOYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	5.06	-2.98
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.66	5.25	-2.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.71	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	10.72	-8.63
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.26	41.63	-35.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the CCOYX Sharpe Ratio of 5.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHQX and CCOYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWHQX	CCOYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	5.06	-2.98
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	1.04	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.04	-0.20

Drawdowns

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHQX drawdown since its inception was -42.61%, which is greater than CCOYX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHQX and CCOYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHQX	CCOYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.61%	-37.16%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.34%	-12.31%	-9.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.48%	-29.08%	+2.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.61%	-37.16%	-5.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.11%	-7.69%	+0.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.11%	3.17%	+3.94%

Volatility

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund (NWHQX) is 5.59%, while Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) has a volatility of 7.25%. This indicates that NWHQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCOYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHQX	CCOYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.59%	7.25%	-1.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.94%	20.07%	-3.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.40%	26.09%	-4.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.37%	26.21%	+0.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.21%	26.76%	-1.55%

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHQX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than CCOYX's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWHQX vs. CCOYX - Dividend Comparison

NWHQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than CCOYX's 5.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class	5.09%	8.08%	12.32%	4.60%	8.17%	10.62%	9.52%	10.61%	11.42%	10.60%	0.00%	0.00%
NWHQX Nationwide Bailard Technology and Science Fund	9.36%	11.71%	12.90%	6.49%	11.34%	17.51%	11.54%	7.38%	17.44%	10.29%	7.72%	8.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWHQX and CCOYX in my portfolio?

NWHQX and CCOYX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NWHQX or CCOYX?

CCOYX has higher volatility (7.25%) compared to NWHQX (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHQX dropped -42.61% vs CCOYX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCOYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.06 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.