CCOYX vs. GTTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX).
CCOYX is an actively managed fund by Columbia. It was launched on Jun 23, 1983. GTTIX is an actively managed fund by Gabelli. It was launched on Nov 1, 1993.
Performance
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class | 0.25% | 37.79% | 27.11% | 44.77% | -30.92% | 39.45% | 44.92% | 54.68% | -7.78% | 19.33% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | -2.99% | 27.42% | 14.93% | 22.82% | -28.59% | 5.17% | 16.44% | 16.44% | -11.28% | 9.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CCOYX achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly higher than GTTIX's -2.99% return.
CCOYX
- 1D
- -2.98%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.33%
- 1Y
- 58.69%
- 3Y*
- 29.72%
- 5Y*
- 16.92%
- 10Y*
- —
GTTIX
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- -7.81%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -2.67%
- 1Y
- 19.49%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 4.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CCOYX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than GTTIX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CCOYX vs. GTTIX — Risk / Return Rank
CCOYX
GTTIX
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) and Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CCOYX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.92 | 1.30 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.48 | 1.81 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 1.78 | +1.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.62 | 4.64 | +8.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CCOYX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.92 | 1.30 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.28 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.41 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between CCOYX and GTTIX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Dividend Comparison
CCOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.06%, less than GTTIX's 18.49% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCOYX Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class | 8.06% | 8.08% | 12.32% | 4.60% | 8.17% | 10.62% | 9.52% | 10.61% | 11.42% | 10.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTTIX Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I | 18.49% | 17.94% | 0.00% | 0.32% | 2.29% | 6.74% | 3.09% | 7.22% | 6.96% | 7.11% | 7.34% | 8.62% |
Drawdowns
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CCOYX drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum GTTIX drawdown of -39.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CCOYX and GTTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CCOYX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -39.84% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -9.45% | -5.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.16% | -39.84% | +2.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.91% | -7.99% | -3.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.82% | -8.22% | +0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 3.67% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CCOYX vs. GTTIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Seligman Technology and Information Fund Institutional 3 Class (CCOYX) has a higher volatility of 9.50% compared to Gabelli Global Content & Connectivity Fund Class I (GTTIX) at 4.71%. This indicates that CCOYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CCOYX | GTTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.50% | 4.71% | +4.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.01% | 9.96% | +11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.59% | 14.62% | +15.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.96% | 16.26% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.70% | 16.30% | +10.40% |