NWHFX vs. FISVX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NWHFX (Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund) and FISVX (Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, NWHFX returned 8.53%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for FISVX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. NWHFX charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FISVX.

Performance

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with NWHFX having a 18.47% return and FISVX slightly higher at 18.90%.

NWHFX

• 1D: 0.90%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: 18.47%
• 6M: 18.23%
• 1Y: 37.16%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: 8.53%
• 10Y*: 10.65%

FISVX

• 1D: 0.96%
• 1M: 4.03%
• YTD: 18.90%
• 6M: 18.08%
• 1Y: 43.18%
• 3Y*: 18.51%
• 5Y*: 7.06%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund	18.47%	9.95%	10.23%	15.78%	-12.91%	36.15%	8.82%	7.78%
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund	18.90%	12.70%	8.16%	14.72%	-14.42%	28.26%	4.49%	9.54%

Correlation

The correlation between NWHFX and FISVX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019	0.97

The correlation between NWHFX and FISVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NWHFX vs. FISVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NWHFX

NWHFX Risk / Return Rank: 71
NWHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
NWHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
NWHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
NWHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
NWHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FISVX

FISVX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FISVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FISVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FISVX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FISVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FISVX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NWHFX	FISVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.54	-0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	3.54	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.60	5.34	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.12	18.11	-1.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NWHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FISVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NWHFX and FISVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NWHFX	FISVX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.54	-0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.33	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.42	+0.03

Drawdowns

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NWHFX drawdown since its inception was -47.51%, which is greater than FISVX's maximum drawdown of -44.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWHFX and FISVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NWHFX	FISVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.51%	-44.66%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-8.54%	+0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.68%	-26.50%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.68%	-26.50%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.24%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.35%	-10.34%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	2.51%	-0.09%

Volatility

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund (NWHFX) is 4.49%, while Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund (FISVX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that NWHFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FISVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NWHFX	FISVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.89%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.38%	11.97%	-0.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.64%	17.95%	-1.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.56%	21.71%	-1.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.79%	26.74%	-3.95%

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NWHFX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than FISVX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

NWHFX vs. FISVX - Dividend Comparison

NWHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.78%, more than FISVX's 1.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FISVX Fidelity Small Cap Value Index Fund	1.83%	2.18%	1.70%	2.06%	3.69%	9.55%	1.33%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NWHFX Nationwide Bailard Cognitive Value Fund	9.78%	11.48%	13.85%	1.38%	3.31%	4.98%	0.83%	0.65%	15.39%	11.63%	0.62%	1.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NWHFX and FISVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, NWHFX and FISVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, NWHFX or FISVX?

FISVX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to NWHFX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWHFX dropped -47.51% vs FISVX's -44.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FISVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.