NWAQX vs. TDIFX
NWAQX (Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund) and TDIFX (Dimensional Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, NWAQX returned 8.62%/yr vs 4.53%/yr for TDIFX. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. NWAQX charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for TDIFX.
Performance
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NWAQX achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than TDIFX's 3.13% return.
NWAQX
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 8.05%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 1Y
- 22.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.41%
TDIFX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 1Y
- 6.56%
- 3Y*
- 6.30%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 4.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund | 10.92% | 19.12% | 12.92% | 20.25% | -19.01% | 17.34% | 24.26% |
TDIFX Dimensional Retirement Income Fund | 3.13% | 7.22% | 6.21% | 7.76% | -9.37% | 14.53% | 9.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between NWAQX and TDIFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | 0.76 |
The correlation between NWAQX and TDIFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NWAQX vs. TDIFX — Risk / Return Rank
NWAQX
TDIFX
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) and Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NWAQX | TDIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.36 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.57 | -0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 10.69 | -1.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NWAQX drawdown since its inception was -29.29%, which is greater than TDIFX's maximum drawdown of -12.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NWAQX and TDIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NWAQX | TDIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.29% | -12.21% | -17.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -2.61% | -6.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -3.51% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.97% | -12.21% | -14.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -12.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.72% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -1.73% | -4.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 0.61% | +1.49% |
Volatility
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Volatility Comparison
Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund (NWAQX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Dimensional Retirement Income Fund (TDIFX) at 0.88%. This indicates that NWAQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NWAQX | TDIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 0.88% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 2.80% | +8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.02% | 3.51% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.38% | 5.91% | +9.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.63% | 5.07% | +13.56% |
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NWAQX has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TDIFX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
NWAQX vs. TDIFX - Dividend Comparison
NWAQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than TDIFX's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NWAQX Nationwide Destination 2065 Fund | 5.95% | 6.54% | 9.49% | 2.23% | 1.38% | 5.43% | 6.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDIFX Dimensional Retirement Income Fund | 3.26% | 1.77% | 3.11% | 3.09% | 4.66% | 9.39% | 1.39% | 1.98% | 2.11% | 0.98% | 0.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NWAQX and TDIFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NWAQX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to TDIFX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NWAQX dropped -29.29% vs TDIFX's -12.21%.
TDIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NWAQX and TDIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer