NVYY vs. SPUU
NVYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVYY is actively managed, while SPUU is passively managed. Over the past year, NVYY returned 31.22% vs 53.61% for SPUU. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
NVYY vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVYY achieves a 4.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 19.82% return.
NVYY
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 4.98%
- YTD
- 4.60%
- 6M
- 3.99%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPUU
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 10.01%
- YTD
- 19.82%
- 6M
- 19.11%
- 1Y
- 53.61%
- 3Y*
- 38.21%
- 5Y*
- 20.19%
- 10Y*
- 24.77%
NVYY vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 4.60% | 31.62% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 19.82% | 31.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVYY and SPUU is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.55 |
The correlation between NVYY and SPUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVYY vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
NVYY
SPUU
NVYY vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVYY | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 2.96 | -0.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.82 | 13.06 | -8.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVYY | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.26 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.48 | 0.63 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
NVYY vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVYY drawdown since its inception was -14.90%, smaller than the maximum SPUU drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVYY and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVYY | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.90% | -59.35% | +44.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -18.19% | +3.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -59.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.86% | -1.27% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.00% | -9.51% | +4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.50% | 4.12% | +2.38% |
Volatility
NVYY vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF (NVYY) is 4.65%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that NVYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVYY | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.71% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.78% | 18.09% | -1.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 23.90% | +0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 33.46% | -9.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.10% | 35.77% | -11.67% |
NVYY vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVYY vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
NVYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 147.62%, more than SPUU's 1.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST NVDA ETF | 147.62% | 75.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares | 1.34% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVYY and SPUU have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUU has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to NVYY (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVYY dropped -14.90% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 1-year performance, SPUU leads with 53.61% vs 31.22% for NVYY. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. On volatility, NVYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 53.61% return vs 31.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for NVYY.
NVYY has the higher dividend yield at 147.62%, compared with 1.34% for SPUU.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for NVYY and 0.64% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVYY and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer