NVTX vs. BNKU

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVTX (Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF) and BNKU (MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVTX is actively managed, while BNKU is passively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVTX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BNKU.

Performance

NVTX vs. BNKU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVTX achieves a 250.82% return, which is significantly higher than BNKU's 24.58% return.

NVTX

• 1D: -19.51%
• 1M: -54.78%
• YTD: 250.82%
• 6M: 201.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BNKU

• 1D: 2.43%
• 1M: 29.65%
• YTD: 24.58%
• 6M: 18.43%
• 1Y: 119.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVTX vs. BNKU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVTX Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF	250.82%	-11.25%
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	24.58%	34.64%

Correlation

The correlation between NVTX and BNKU is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

NVTX vs. BNKU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BNKU

BNKU Risk / Return Rank: 57
BNKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
BNKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
BNKU Omega Ratio Rank: 54
BNKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
BNKU Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVTX vs. BNKU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF (NVTX) and MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs (BNKU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVTX	BNKU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.08	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.40	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.93	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.71	—

Drawdowns

NVTX vs. BNKU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVTX drawdown since its inception was -89.20%, which is greater than BNKU's maximum drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVTX and BNKU.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVTX	BNKU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.20%	-61.21%	-27.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-40.97%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-61.33%	0.00%	-61.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.89%	-17.75%	-42.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	15.55%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVTX	BNKU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	16.22%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.27%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	265.87%	57.74%	+208.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	265.87%	72.83%	+193.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	265.87%	72.83%	+193.04%

NVTX vs. BNKU - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVTX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BNKU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVTX vs. BNKU - Dividend Comparison

NVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while BNKU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BNKU MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks Index 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%
NVTX Tradr 2X Long NVTS Daily ETF	4.86%	17.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVTX and BNKU in my portfolio?

NVTX and BNKU have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVTX or BNKU?

On fees, BNKU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVTX or BNKU?

BNKU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for NVTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVTX or BNKU?

NVTX has the higher dividend yield at 4.86%, compared with 0.00% for BNKU.

What is the main difference between NVTX and BNKU?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for NVTX and 0.95% for BNKU.