PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVS vs. T
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVS vs. T - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NVS) and AT&T Inc. (T). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has outperformed T with an annualized return of 11.14%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.


NVS

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.40%
6M
18.98%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
11.14%

T

1D
2.52%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.96%
6M
-1.93%
1Y
-12.96%
3Y*
20.58%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
3.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVS vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVS
Novartis AG
14.40%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%
T
AT&T Inc.
-2.96%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%

Correlation

The correlation between NVS and T is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 1996

0.26

The correlation between NVS and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

NVS:

$6.99

T:

$3.04

PE Ratio

NVS:

21.90

T:

7.74

PEG Ratio

NVS:

1.48

T:

0.32

PS Ratio

NVS:

5.29

T:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVS:

$56.05B

T:

$125.65B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVS:

$42.19B

T:

$105.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVS:

$22.40B

T:

$54.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVS vs. T — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVS vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.92

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

-0.59

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

-1.22

+7.10

NVS vs. T - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the T Sharpe Ratio of -0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVS and T, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVS vs. T - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and T.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-64.15%

+22.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-21.87%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-21.87%

+1.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-32.01%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

-42.35%

+16.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-18.12%

+11.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-15.72%

+4.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

10.64%

-5.41%

Volatility

NVS vs. T - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Novartis AG (NVS) is 7.18%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that NVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

8.21%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

17.80%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

22.13%

-1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

24.01%

-5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

23.73%

-4.09%

Dividends

NVS vs. T - Dividend Comparison

NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than T's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVS
Novartis AG
3.12%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%
T
AT&T Inc.
4.71%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%

Financials

NVS vs. T - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B40.00B45.00B20222023202420252026
13.52B
33.47B
(NVS) Total Revenue
(T) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NVS and T have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to NVS (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVS dropped -42.10% vs T's -64.15%.

NVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVS and T

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer