NVS vs. T
NVS (Novartis AG) and T (AT&T Inc.) are both stocks. NVS operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare), while T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, NVS returned 11.14%/yr vs 3.33%/yr for T. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVS vs. T - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly higher than T's -2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has outperformed T with an annualized return of 11.14%, while T has yielded a comparatively lower 3.33% annualized return.
NVS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 14.40%
- 6M
- 18.98%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.57%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
NVS vs. T - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVS Novartis AG | 14.40% | 46.95% | 0.02% | 16.14% | 8.06% | -3.65% | 3.34% | 13.92% | 5.95% | 19.42% |
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVS and T is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 1996 | 0.26 |
The correlation between NVS and T shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
NVS:
$6.99
T:
$3.04
NVS:
21.90
T:
7.74
NVS:
1.48
T:
0.32
NVS:
5.29
T:
1.35
NVS:
$56.05B
T:
$125.65B
NVS:
$42.19B
T:
$105.41B
NVS:
$22.40B
T:
$54.70B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVS vs. T — Risk / Return Rank
NVS
T
NVS vs. T - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and AT&T Inc. (T). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.92 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.43 | -0.59 | +3.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | -1.22 | +7.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVS vs. T - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum T drawdown of -64.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and T.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.10% | -64.15% | +22.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.65% | -21.87% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.95% | -21.87% | +1.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.42% | -32.01% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.03% | -42.35% | +16.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -18.12% | +11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -15.72% | +4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.23% | 10.64% | -5.41% |
Volatility
NVS vs. T - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Novartis AG (NVS) is 7.18%, while AT&T Inc. (T) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that NVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than T based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVS | T | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.18% | 8.21% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.96% | 17.80% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.02% | 22.13% | -1.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.89% | 24.01% | -5.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 23.73% | -4.09% |
Dividends
NVS vs. T - Dividend Comparison
NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than T's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVS Novartis AG | 3.12% | 2.90% | 3.84% | 3.44% | 3.70% | 3.86% | 3.22% | 3.03% | 3.47% | 3.24% | 3.73% | 3.10% |
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
NVS vs. T - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and AT&T Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
NVS and T have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to NVS (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVS dropped -42.10% vs T's -64.15%.
NVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVS and T
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer