PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVS vs. HSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVS vs. HSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NVS) and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 14.40% return, which is significantly lower than HSHP's 71.21% return.


NVS

1D
-0.55%
1M
2.22%
YTD
14.40%
6M
18.98%
1Y
30.60%
3Y*
19.57%
5Y*
14.77%
10Y*
11.14%

HSHP

1D
3.05%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
71.21%
6M
71.96%
1Y
144.70%
3Y*
44.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVS vs. HSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVS
Novartis AG
14.40%46.95%0.02%16.14%16.74%
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
71.21%96.10%-23.53%37.12%-1.99%

Correlation

The correlation between NVS and HSHP is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022

0.11

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVS:

$293.28B

HSHP:

$715.11M

EPS

NVS:

$6.99

HSHP:

$0.63

PE Ratio

NVS:

21.90

HSHP:

24.25

PEG Ratio

NVS:

1.48

HSHP:

0.04

PS Ratio

NVS:

5.29

HSHP:

4.92

PB Ratio

NVS:

7.62

HSHP:

4.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVS:

$56.05B

HSHP:

$143.50M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVS:

$42.19B

HSHP:

$98.40M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVS:

$22.40B

HSHP:

$101.44M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVS vs. HSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

HSHP
HSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
HSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVS vs. HSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVSHSHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.49

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

9.35

-6.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.88

21.19

-15.31

NVS vs. HSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the HSHP Sharpe Ratio of 3.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVS and HSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVS vs. HSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum HSHP drawdown of -51.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and HSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVSHSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-51.51%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-15.57%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-51.51%

+31.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-5.38%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.92%

-14.76%

+3.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

6.85%

-1.62%

Volatility

NVS vs. HSHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Novartis AG (NVS) is 7.18%, while Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) has a volatility of 13.10%. This indicates that NVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVSHSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.18%

13.10%

-5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.96%

30.50%

-15.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.02%

39.51%

-18.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.89%

42.51%

-23.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.64%

42.51%

-22.87%

Dividends

NVS vs. HSHP - Dividend Comparison

NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, less than HSHP's 3.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSHP
Himalaya Shipping Ltd.
3.81%3.57%9.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.12%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

NVS vs. HSHP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Himalaya Shipping Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
13.52B
33.60M
(NVS) Total Revenue
(HSHP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVS vs. HSHP - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Novartis AG and Himalaya Shipping Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
74.4%
54.8%
Portfolio components
NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

HSHP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

HSHP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

HSHP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVS and HSHP have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HSHP has higher volatility (13.10%) compared to NVS (7.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVS dropped -42.10% vs HSHP's -51.51%.

HSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVS and HSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer