HSHP vs. BE
HSHP (Himalaya Shipping Ltd.) and BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — HSHP in Marine Shipping, BE in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 3 years, HSHP returned 34.56%/yr vs 111.29%/yr for BE. Their 0.17 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
HSHP vs. BE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, HSHP achieves a 60.66% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 88.46% return.
HSHP
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- 6M
- 43.33%
- YTD
- 60.66%
- 1Y
- 114.06%
- 3Y*
- 34.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 32.82%
BE
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -40.46%
- 6M
- -0.99%
- YTD
- 88.46%
- 1Y
- 371.22%
- 3Y*
- 111.29%
- 5Y*
- 49.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.60B | $3.53B | $3.41B | |
| $4.45M | $4.42M | $4.86M |
HSHP vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSHP Himalaya Shipping Ltd. | 60.66% | 87.24% | -28.11% | 37.12% | -1.99% |
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 88.46% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between HSHP and BE is 0.10, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.17 |
Fundamentals
HSHP:
$689.26M
BE:
$46.58B
HSHP:
$0.63
BE:
$0.86
HSHP:
23.26
BE:
190.80
HSHP:
4.72
BE:
15.01
HSHP:
4.41
BE:
32.84
HSHP:
$143.50M
BE:
$3.11B
HSHP:
$98.40M
BE:
$972.69M
HSHP:
$101.44M
BE:
$309.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HSHP vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank
HSHP
BE
HSHP vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HSHP | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.38 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.29 | 7.11 | -0.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.82 | 20.92 | -6.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HSHP vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HSHP drawdown since its inception was -53.89%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HSHP and BE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HSHP | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.89% | -92.54% | +38.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.35% | -52.65% | +34.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.89% | -52.65% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -75.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.98% | -52.65% | +42.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.08% | -51.50% | +35.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.76% | 17.85% | -10.09% |
Volatility
HSHP vs. BE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Himalaya Shipping Ltd. (HSHP) is 14.38%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 35.59%. This indicates that HSHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HSHP | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.38% | 35.59% | -21.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.35% | 82.05% | -48.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.76% | 111.83% | -71.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 87.99% | -45.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 96.31% | -53.57% |
Dividends
HSHP vs. BE - Dividend Comparison
Neither HSHP nor BE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
HSHP vs. BE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Himalaya Shipping Ltd. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
HSHP vs. BE - Profitability Comparison
HSHP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a gross profit of 18.40M and revenue of 33.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.8%.
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 355.57M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
HSHP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported an operating income of 17.20M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 51.2%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 182.24M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
HSHP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Himalaya Shipping Ltd. reported a net income of 5.00M and revenue of 33.60M, resulting in a net margin of 14.9%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 196.29M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
HSHP and BE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (35.59%) compared to HSHP (14.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HSHP dropped -53.89% vs BE's -92.54%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.35 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HSHP and BE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer