PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVS vs. COR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVS vs. COR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Novartis AG (NVS) and Cencora Inc. (COR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVS achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than COR's -9.63% return. Over the past 10 years, NVS has underperformed COR with an annualized return of 9.95%, while COR has yielded a comparatively higher 16.86% annualized return.


NVS

1D
-2.73%
1M
1.69%
6M
6.77%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
34.89%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
14.79%
10Y*
9.95%
ALL TIME*
8.95%

COR

1D
-1.27%
1M
11.83%
6M
-13.99%
YTD
-9.63%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
22.57%
10Y*
16.86%
ALL TIME*
17.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVS vs. COR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVS
Novartis AG
11.78%46.95%0.02%16.14%8.06%-3.65%3.34%13.92%5.95%19.42%
COR
Cencora Inc.
-9.63%51.48%10.37%25.33%26.26%44.09%23.37%23.51%-17.57%19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between NVS and COR is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 1996

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVS:

$285.37B

COR:

$59.14B

EPS

NVS:

$7.02

COR:

$13.08

PE Ratio

NVS:

21.31

COR:

23.24

PEG Ratio

NVS:

1.44

COR:

11.04

PS Ratio

NVS:

5.15

COR:

0.18

PB Ratio

NVS:

7.44

COR:

17.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVS:

$56.05B

COR:

$328.68B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVS:

$42.19B

COR:

$11.66B

EBITDA (TTM)

NVS:

$22.40B

COR:

$3.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVS vs. COR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVS
NVS Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
NVS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVS Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NVS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVS Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

COR
COR Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
COR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
COR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
COR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
COR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVS vs. COR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novartis AG (NVS) and Cencora Inc. (COR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVSCORDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.06

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

0.14

+2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

0.34

+6.24

NVS vs. COR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVS Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the COR Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVS and COR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVS vs. COR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVS drawdown since its inception was -42.10%, smaller than the maximum COR drawdown of -71.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVS and COR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVSCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.10%

-71.01%

+28.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-32.44%

+19.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-32.44%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.42%

-32.44%

+12.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-26.03%

-32.44%

+6.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.60%

-18.56%

+9.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.91%

-13.65%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.31%

13.44%

-8.13%

Volatility

NVS vs. COR - Volatility Comparison

Novartis AG (NVS) and Cencora Inc. (COR) have volatilities of 8.03% and 8.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVSCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.03%

8.14%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

27.74%

-11.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.51%

30.84%

-9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

22.46%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.69%

27.54%

-7.85%

Dividends

NVS vs. COR - Dividend Comparison

NVS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than COR's 0.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COR
Cencora Inc.
0.77%0.67%0.93%0.96%1.13%5.13%6.74%7.48%2.07%1.61%1.77%1.17%
NVS
Novartis AG
3.19%2.90%3.84%3.44%3.70%3.86%3.22%3.03%3.47%3.24%3.73%3.10%

Financials

NVS vs. COR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Novartis AG and Cencora Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B40.00B60.00B80.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
13.52B
78.36B
(NVS) Total Revenue
(COR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVS vs. COR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Novartis AG and Cencora Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
74.4%
4.6%
Portfolio components
NVS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novartis AG reported a gross profit of 10.07B and revenue of 13.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

COR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.59B and revenue of 78.36B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 4.6%.

NVS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novartis AG reported an operating income of 4.24B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.3%.

COR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cencora Inc. reported an operating income of 1.14B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.5%.

NVS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Novartis AG reported a net income of 3.16B and revenue of 13.52B, resulting in a net margin of 23.3%.

COR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Cencora Inc. reported a net income of 1.64B and revenue of 78.36B, resulting in a net margin of 2.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVS and COR have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COR has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to NVS (8.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVS dropped -42.10% vs COR's -71.01%.

NVS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVS and COR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer