PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVR vs. TPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVR vs. TPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a -12.59% return, which is significantly lower than TPL's 32.28% return. Over the past 10 years, NVR has underperformed TPL with an annualized return of 14.09%, while TPL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.58% annualized return.


NVR

1D
-1.62%
1M
14.58%
YTD
-12.59%
6M
-15.20%
1Y
-11.77%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
14.09%

TPL

1D
2.53%
1M
-2.32%
YTD
32.28%
6M
35.91%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
38.06%
5Y*
18.80%
10Y*
36.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVR vs. TPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVR
NVR, Inc.
-12.59%-10.83%16.83%51.77%-21.94%44.83%7.13%56.28%-30.53%110.20%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
32.28%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%

Correlation

The correlation between NVR and TPL is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1987

0.10

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVR:

$18.67B

TPL:

$26.15B

EPS

NVR:

$408.34

TPL:

$7.30

PE Ratio

NVR:

15.61

TPL:

51.93

PEG Ratio

NVR:

1.52

TPL:

2.75

PS Ratio

NVR:

2.00

TPL:

31.17

PB Ratio

NVR:

5.34

TPL:

16.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVR:

$9.66B

TPL:

$839.03M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVR:

$2.17B

TPL:

$625.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVR:

$1.60B

TPL:

$690.06M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVR vs. TPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVR
NVR Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
NVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
NVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVR Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVR vs. TPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVRTPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

1.06

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

0.13

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

0.25

-1.12

NVR vs. TPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.50, which is lower than the TPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVR and TPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVR vs. TPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -96.72%, which is greater than TPL's maximum drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and TPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVRTPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.72%

-73.05%

-23.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.88%

-31.68%

-3.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.94%

-52.22%

+8.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.94%

-52.50%

+8.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.13%

-65.46%

+19.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.77%

-33.65%

-2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.19%

-27.27%

+3.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.77%

17.08%

-1.31%

Volatility

NVR vs. TPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 7.42%, while Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) has a volatility of 14.23%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVRTPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.42%

14.23%

-6.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

38.06%

-17.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.34%

46.87%

-19.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.55%

46.25%

-18.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.97%

47.10%

-15.13%

Dividends

NVR vs. TPL - Dividend Comparison

NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVR
NVR, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.60%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

NVR vs. TPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVR, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.83B
236.82M
(NVR) Total Revenue
(TPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NVR vs. TPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVR, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
19.6%
0
Portfolio components
NVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 360.34M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.6%.

TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 236.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.37M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 182.33M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 77.0%.

NVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 198.36M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 142.90M and revenue of 236.82M, resulting in a net margin of 60.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVR and TPL have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TPL has higher volatility (14.23%) compared to NVR (7.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVR dropped -96.72% vs TPL's -73.05%.

TPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVR and TPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer