NVOX vs. QTAP
NVOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF) and QTAP (Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVOX returned -70.73% vs 21.29% for QTAP. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QTAP.
Performance
NVOX vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOX achieves a -27.91% return, which is significantly lower than QTAP's 12.75% return.
NVOX
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 8.23%
- YTD
- -27.91%
- 6M
- -32.39%
- 1Y
- -70.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTAP
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -0.97%
- YTD
- 12.75%
- 6M
- 12.65%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- —
NVOX vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
NVOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF | -27.91% | -76.65% | -43.69% |
QTAP Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April | 12.75% | 19.36% | -0.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOX and QTAP is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2024 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOX vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank
NVOX
QTAP
NVOX vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF (NVOX) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVOX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.89 | -1.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 8.59 | -9.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.16 | 48.57 | -49.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVOX vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOX drawdown since its inception was -94.50%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOX and QTAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.50% | -29.44% | -65.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.84% | -2.49% | -80.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.65% | -1.77% | -88.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.78% | -4.99% | -69.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.85% | 0.44% | +60.41% |
Volatility
NVOX vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long NVO ETF (NVOX) has a higher volatility of 23.66% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 3.03%. This indicates that NVOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOX | QTAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.66% | 3.03% | +20.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.65% | 4.94% | +74.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 103.37% | 6.09% | +97.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 103.02% | 18.92% | +84.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 103.02% | 18.71% | +84.31% |
NVOX vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOX vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison
Neither NVOX nor QTAP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOX and QTAP have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOX has higher volatility (23.66%) compared to QTAP (3.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOX dropped -94.50% vs QTAP's -29.44%.
On 1-year performance, QTAP leads with 21.29% vs -70.73% for NVOX. On fees, QTAP is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 3.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTAP has performed better with a 21.29% return vs -70.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QTAP is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for NVOX.
NVOX and QTAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for NVOX and 0.79% for QTAP.
QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOX and QTAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer