NVOH vs. VXUS
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVOH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. NVOH is actively managed, while VXUS is passively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -22.77% vs 28.83% for VXUS. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
NVOH vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 13.40% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.60%
- YTD
- -0.97%
- 6M
- -3.24%
- 1Y
- -22.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VXUS
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 13.40%
- 6M
- 13.15%
- 1Y
- 28.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
NVOH vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -0.97% | -43.79% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 13.40% | 30.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and VXUS is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
VXUS
NVOH vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVOH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.33 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 2.57 | -3.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.78 | 9.84 | -10.62 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than VXUS's maximum drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -35.97% | -25.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -46.22% | -11.27% | -34.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.44% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.89% | -2.27% | -45.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.76% | -8.19% | -30.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.21% | 2.94% | +26.27% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) has a higher volatility of 11.15% compared to Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) at 6.84%. This indicates that NVOH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.15% | 6.84% | +4.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.97% | 14.45% | +22.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.38% | 16.30% | +33.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.74% | 16.27% | +32.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 48.74% | 17.02% | +31.72% |
NVOH vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
NVOH vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than VXUS's 2.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 6.53% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.57% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and VXUS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVOH has higher volatility (11.15%) compared to VXUS (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 1-year performance, VXUS leads with 28.83% vs -22.77% for NVOH. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VXUS has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 28.83% return vs -22.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for NVOH.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 2.57% for VXUS.
NVOH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.05% for VXUS.
VXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer