NVOH vs. DBO
NVOH (Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - NVOH is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Precidian, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. NVOH is actively managed, while DBO is passively managed. Over the past year, NVOH returned -36.21% vs 77.38% for DBO. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. NVOH charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
NVOH vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVOH achieves a -10.34% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
NVOH
- 1D
- 3.80%
- 1M
- -1.42%
- YTD
- -10.34%
- 6M
- -5.34%
- 1Y
- -36.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
NVOH vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | -10.34% | -42.98% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVOH and DBO is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVOH vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
NVOH
DBO
NVOH vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVOH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.36 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.69 | 4.28 | -4.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.00 | 8.69 | -9.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVOH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.73 | 2.25 | -2.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.78 | 0.02 | -0.80 |
Drawdowns
NVOH vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVOH drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVOH and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVOH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.60% | -90.18% | +28.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.00% | -18.19% | -34.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.82% | -52.68% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -62.25% | +23.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.19% | 8.94% | +27.25% |
Volatility
NVOH vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF (NVOH) is 7.97%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that NVOH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVOH | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 12.79% | -4.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.37% | 28.32% | +8.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.53% | 34.58% | +14.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 32.31% | +16.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.08% | 31.79% | +17.29% |
NVOH vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVOH has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVOH vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
NVOH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
NVOH Novo Nordisk A/S (B Shares) ADRhedged ETF | 3.82% | 2.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVOH and DBO have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to NVOH (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVOH dropped -61.60% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 1-year performance, DBO leads with 77.38% vs -36.21% for NVOH. On fees, NVOH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, NVOH has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DBO has performed better with a 77.38% return vs -36.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVOH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
NVOH has the higher dividend yield at 3.82%, compared with 1.95% for DBO.
NVOH is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Precidian and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for NVOH and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVOH and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer