NVO vs. PAVE
NVO (Novo Nordisk A/S) is a stock, while PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) is Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Over the past 5 years, NVO returned 2.92%/yr vs 17.84%/yr for PAVE. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVO achieves a -10.74% return, which is significantly lower than PAVE's 20.86% return.
NVO
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -10.74%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- -42.47%
- 3Y*
- -15.59%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- YTD
- 20.86%
- 6M
- 18.50%
- 1Y
- 38.94%
- 3Y*
- 25.14%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- —
NVO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -10.74% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 64.33% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 20.86% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVO and PAVE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
NVO
PAVE
NVO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.32 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.80 | 3.11 | -3.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | 11.32 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVO drawdown since its inception was -74.70%, which is greater than PAVE's maximum drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVO and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.70% | -44.08% | -30.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -54.34% | -11.91% | -42.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.70% | -26.23% | -48.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.70% | -26.23% | -48.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -74.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.11% | -1.01% | -67.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.79% | -6.23% | -11.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 37.62% | 3.27% | +34.35% |
Volatility
NVO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a higher volatility of 10.68% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 7.35%. This indicates that NVO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.68% | 7.35% | +3.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.04% | 15.87% | +22.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.88% | 19.49% | +32.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.33% | 21.70% | +16.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.56% | 24.40% | +8.16% |
Dividends
NVO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than PAVE's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.11% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.76% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVO has higher volatility (10.68%) compared to PAVE (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVO dropped -74.70% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
PAVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVO and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer