NVLIX vs. QQQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX).
NVLIX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on May 15, 2009. QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | -11.60% | 12.76% | 29.48% | 43.60% | -31.31% | 27.62% | 37.97% | 33.54% | 3.02% | 33.09% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -0.51% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVLIX achieves a -11.60% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, NVLIX has outperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 15.48%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.87% annualized return.
NVLIX
- 1D
- 3.68%
- 1M
- -6.71%
- YTD
- -11.60%
- 6M
- -11.36%
- 1Y
- 9.95%
- 3Y*
- 18.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.66%
- 10Y*
- 15.48%
QQQX
- 1D
- 4.05%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- 4.98%
- 1Y
- 26.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVLIX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
NVLIX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank
NVLIX
QQQX
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVLIX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 1.26 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.84 | 1.87 | -1.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.29 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.39 | 2.10 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 10.38 | -9.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVLIX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 1.26 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.57 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 0.46 | +0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between NVLIX and QQQX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
NVLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.40%, more than QQQX's 8.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVLIX Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I | 25.40% | 22.45% | 14.35% | 5.39% | 8.93% | 9.51% | 5.47% | 8.69% | 18.81% | 18.70% | 17.11% | 15.18% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.27% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
Drawdowns
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVLIX drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVLIX and QQQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVLIX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -57.25% | +17.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.01% | -12.93% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -29.33% | -10.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.57% | -35.96% | -3.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.03% | -0.86% | -15.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.20% | -8.09% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.80% | 2.61% | +3.19% |
Volatility
NVLIX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class I (NVLIX) is 6.85%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 8.15%. This indicates that NVLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| NVLIX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.85% | 8.15% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 11.99% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 21.13% | +1.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.40% | 19.80% | +2.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 21.05% | +0.94% |