NVIR vs. PXJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

NVIR (Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. NVIR is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVIR returned 19.49%/yr vs 24.79%/yr for PXJ. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. NVIR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

NVIR vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVIR achieves a 22.17% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 46.18% return.

NVIR

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 22.17%
• 6M: 19.29%
• 1Y: 34.67%
• 3Y*: 19.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXJ

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -6.26%
• YTD: 46.18%
• 6M: 38.54%
• 1Y: 82.76%
• 3Y*: 24.79%
• 5Y*: 17.27%
• 10Y*: -0.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVIR vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	22.17%	9.84%	17.53%	6.90%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	46.18%	8.74%	0.21%	11.61%

Correlation

The correlation between NVIR and PXJ is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2023	0.83

The correlation between NVIR and PXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

NVIR vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVIR	PXJ
Energy	78.9%	92.6%
Industrials	11.1%	5.2%
Utilities	3.1%	2.1%
Technology	2.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Healthcare	1.1%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

NVIR vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVIR

NVIR Risk / Return Rank: 70
NVIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
NVIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Omega Ratio Rank: 62
NVIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
NVIR Martin Ratio Rank: 75

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 89
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVIR vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVIR	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.18	3.17	-0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	3.92	-1.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.48	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.95	8.24	-3.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.32	23.98	-9.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVIR vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVIR Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVIR and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVIR	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.18	3.17	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.50	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.02	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	-0.05	+0.95

Drawdowns

NVIR vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVIR drawdown since its inception was -22.47%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVIR and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVIR	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.47%	-94.82%	+72.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-10.10%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.47%	-40.03%	+17.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.08%	-66.60%	+63.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-55.67%	+51.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.43%	3.46%	-1.03%

Volatility

NVIR vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF (NVIR) is 5.78%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that NVIR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVIR	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	7.75%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.26%	18.30%	-6.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.05%	26.41%	-10.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	34.57%	-15.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.24%	39.47%	-20.23%

NVIR vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVIR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVIR vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

NVIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than PXJ's 2.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVIR Horizon Kinetics Energy Remediation ETF	0.75%	0.92%	1.50%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	2.21%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVIR and PXJ in my portfolio?

NVIR and PXJ have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVIR or PXJ?

PXJ has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to NVIR (5.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVIR dropped -22.47% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

Which ETF is better, NVIR or PXJ?

On 3-year performance, PXJ leads with 24.79% vs 19.49% for NVIR. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, NVIR has been the lower-risk option at 5.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVIR or PXJ?

Over the 3-year period, PXJ has performed better with a 24.79% return vs 19.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVIR or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for NVIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVIR or PXJ?

PXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 0.75% for NVIR.

What is the main difference between NVIR and PXJ?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for NVIR and 0.63% for PXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.