PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVII vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVII vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 15.50% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


NVII

1D
-3.35%
1M
6.25%
YTD
15.50%
6M
18.61%
1Y
62.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
15.50%48.28%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%2.14%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and IBIC is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2025

-0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVII vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII
NVII Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVIIIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

2.24

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

17.27

-13.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

67.45

-58.81

NVII vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVII Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVII and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVIIIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.83

5.05

-3.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.04

3.49

-1.45

Drawdowns

NVII vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVIIIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-0.90%

-17.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.47%

-0.26%

-18.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.54%

-0.13%

-8.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-0.10%

-5.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

0.07%

+7.17%

Volatility

NVII vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that NVII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVIIIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.22%

0.33%

+11.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.24%

0.67%

+24.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.40%

0.90%

+33.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.54%

1.58%

+32.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.54%

1.58%

+32.96%

NVII vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVII has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVII vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.55%, more than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
NVII
REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF
51.55%29.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVII and IBIC have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVII has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVII dropped -18.47% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, NVII leads with 62.33% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVII has performed better with a 62.33% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVII.

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 51.55%, compared with 3.59% for IBIC.

NVII is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: REX and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVII and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVII and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer