NVII vs. GDXW

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

NVII (REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF) and GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVII is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while GDXW is a Gold fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

NVII vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVII achieves a 18.10% return, which is significantly higher than GDXW's -3.22% return.

NVII

• 1D: 2.26%
• 1M: 9.62%
• YTD: 18.10%
• 6M: 18.53%
• 1Y: 65.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXW

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: 0.20%
• YTD: -3.22%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVII vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF	18.10%	-6.72%
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-3.22%	21.25%

Correlation

The correlation between NVII and GDXW is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

NVII vs. GDXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVII

NVII Risk / Return Rank: 57
NVII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
NVII Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
NVII Omega Ratio Rank: 49
NVII Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
NVII Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVII vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF (NVII) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVII	GDXW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.04	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVII	GDXW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.14	0.51	+1.62

Drawdowns

NVII vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVII drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum GDXW drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVII and GDXW.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVII	GDXW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.47%	-36.83%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.48%	-31.82%	+25.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.50%	-13.58%	+8.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.25%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	NVII	GDXW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	34.37%	61.21%	-26.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.53%	61.21%	-26.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.53%	61.21%	-26.68%

NVII vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVII and GDXW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

NVII vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison

NVII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 50.41%, more than GDXW's 38.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	38.71%	7.48%
NVII REX NVDA Growth & Income ETF	50.41%	29.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVII and GDXW in my portfolio?

NVII and GDXW have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, NVII or GDXW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVII or GDXW?

NVII and GDXW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVII or GDXW?

NVII has the higher dividend yield at 50.41%, compared with 38.71% for GDXW.

What is the main difference between NVII and GDXW?

NVII is categorized as Derivative Income, while GDXW is Gold. They also come from different issuers: REX and Roundhill.