NVDX vs. BMNU
NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) and BMNU (T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from REX. Both are actively managed. Their 0.42 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NVDX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BMNU.
Performance
NVDX vs. BMNU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDX achieves a -2.69% return, which is significantly higher than BMNU's -78.66% return.
NVDX
- 1D
- 5.58%
- 1M
- 3.93%
- 6M
- -5.82%
- YTD
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- -0.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 107.47%
BMNU
- 1D
- -8.68%
- 1M
- 32.42%
- 6M
- -71.98%
- YTD
- -78.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $40.53M | $40.79M | $125.50M | |
| $104.20M | $115.30M | $173.21M |
NVDX vs. BMNU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | -2.69% | 1.75% |
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | -78.66% | -80.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDX and BMNU is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDX vs. BMNU — Risk / Return Rank
NVDX
BMNU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NVDX vs. BMNU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) and T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF (BMNU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDX | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.11 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDX vs. BMNU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDX drawdown since its inception was -68.19%, smaller than the maximum BMNU drawdown of -98.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDX and BMNU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDX | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.19% | -98.29% | +30.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.76% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.22% | -97.40% | +65.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.74% | -82.70% | +61.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.46% | — | — |
Volatility
NVDX vs. BMNU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDX | BMNU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.63% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.80% | 183.45% | -110.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.85% | 183.45% | -88.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.85% | 183.45% | -88.60% |
NVDX vs. BMNU - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNU's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDX vs. BMNU - Dividend Comparison
NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, while BMNU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BMNU T-REX 2X Long BMNR Daily Target ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 3.44% | 3.35% | 15.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDX and BMNU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for BMNU.
NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for BMNU.
Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDX and 1.50% for BMNU.
Find the right allocation for NVDX and BMNU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer