PLTW vs. PTIR

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while PTIR is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Palantir Technologies Inc. (200%). PLTW is actively managed, while PTIR is passively managed. Over the past year, PLTW returned -28.95% vs -54.43% for PTIR. Their 0.99 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PLTW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for PTIR.

Performance

PLTW vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -37.29% return, which is significantly higher than PTIR's -60.42% return.

PLTW

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -4.02%
• 6M: -20.95%
• YTD: -37.29%
• 1Y: -28.95%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -13.93%

PTIR

• 1D: 4.65%
• 1M: -7.52%
• 6M: -41.51%
• YTD: -60.42%
• 1Y: -54.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 170.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$2.58M	$2.73M	$3.69M
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	$39.00M	$49.18M	$63.74M

PLTW vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-37.29%	28.26%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	-60.42%	30.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and PTIR is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.99

The correlation between PLTW and PTIR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

PLTW vs. PTIR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PLTW	PTIR
Technology	20.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PLTW vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 6
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 5

PTIR

PTIR Risk / Return Rank: 5
PTIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PTIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PTIR Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PTIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PTIR Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PLTW vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PLTW	PTIR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.46	-0.52	+0.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.32	-0.30	-0.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.96	0.96	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.51	-0.69	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.92	-1.12	+0.20

PLTW vs. PTIR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is comparable to the PTIR Sharpe Ratio of -0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and PTIR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -57.27%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -79.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and PTIR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PLTW	PTIR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.27%	-79.40%	+22.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.27%	-79.40%	+22.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.71%	-72.72%	+24.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.26%	-31.14%	+5.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.63%	48.78%	-17.15%

Volatility

PLTW vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) is 15.51%, while GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR) has a volatility of 27.20%. This indicates that PLTW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTIR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PLTW	PTIR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.51%	27.20%	-11.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.86%	81.38%	-32.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.65%	104.63%	-41.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	73.45%	127.56%	-54.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	73.45%	127.56%	-54.11%

PLTW vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PLTW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PLTW vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 137.47%, more than PTIR's 14.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	137.47%	72.40%
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF	14.68%	5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PLTW and PTIR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, PLTW and PTIR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, PLTW or PTIR?

PTIR has higher volatility (27.20%) compared to PLTW (15.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -57.27% vs PTIR's -79.40%.

Which ETF is better, PLTW or PTIR?

On 1-year performance, PLTW leads with -28.95% vs -54.43% for PTIR. On fees, PLTW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, PLTW has been the lower-risk option at 15.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PLTW or PTIR?

Over the 1-year period, PLTW has performed better with a -28.95% return vs -54.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PLTW or PTIR?

PLTW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for PTIR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PLTW or PTIR?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 137.47%, compared with 14.68% for PTIR.

What is the main difference between PLTW and PTIR?

PLTW is categorized as Derivative Income, while PTIR is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for PLTW and 1.04% for PTIR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.46 vs -0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.