NVDW vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

NVDW (Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDW returned 40.81% vs 115.67% for CHAT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. NVDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

NVDW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDW achieves a 6.30% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 63.45% return.

NVDW

• 1D: -4.59%
• 1M: -8.60%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 4.41%
• 1Y: 40.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: -7.40%
• 1M: 7.27%
• YTD: 63.45%
• 6M: 62.78%
• 1Y: 115.67%
• 3Y*: 51.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDW Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	6.30%	33.44%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	63.45%	45.19%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDW and CHAT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025	0.60

The correlation between NVDW and CHAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

NVDW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDW

NVDW Risk / Return Rank: 29
NVDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
NVDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
NVDW Omega Ratio Rank: 27
NVDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
NVDW Martin Ratio Rank: 28

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	3.34	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	3.54	-2.01
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.49	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.61	7.14	-5.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.72	19.81	-16.09

NVDW vs. CHAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDW Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the CHAT Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDW and CHAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDW drawdown since its inception was -25.54%, smaller than the maximum CHAT drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDW and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDW	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.54%	-31.34%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.54%	-16.28%	-9.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.09%	-7.40%	-10.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.50%	-5.38%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.01%	5.86%	+5.15%

Volatility

NVDW vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF (NVDW) is 15.16%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 19.25%. This indicates that NVDW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDW	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.16%	19.25%	-4.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.09%	29.60%	+2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.50%	34.87%	+7.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.02%	31.22%	+10.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.02%	31.22%	+10.80%

NVDW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

NVDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 63.83%, more than CHAT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.74%	2.85%
NVDW Roundhill NVDA WeeklyPay ETF	63.83%	38.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDW and CHAT in my portfolio?

NVDW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDW or CHAT?

CHAT has higher volatility (19.25%) compared to NVDW (15.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDW dropped -25.54% vs CHAT's -31.34%.

Which ETF is better, NVDW or CHAT?

On 1-year performance, CHAT leads with 115.67% vs 40.81% for NVDW. On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, NVDW has been the lower-risk option at 15.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDW or CHAT?

Over the 1-year period, CHAT has performed better with a 115.67% return vs 40.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDW or CHAT?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for NVDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDW or CHAT?

NVDW has the higher dividend yield at 63.83%, compared with 1.74% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between NVDW and CHAT?

NVDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for NVDW and 0.75% for CHAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.34 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.