PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDS vs. TARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDS vs. TARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -18.53% return, which is significantly lower than TARK's -10.45% return.


NVDS

1D
6.24%
1M
8.67%
YTD
-18.53%
6M
-16.59%
1Y
-47.95%
3Y*
-62.36%
5Y*
10Y*

TARK

1D
-4.11%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-10.45%
6M
-18.36%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
18.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDS vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
-18.53%-58.18%-80.03%-83.15%-16.72%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
-10.45%41.00%-4.85%121.37%-59.57%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and TARK is -0.47, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

-0.52

The correlation between NVDS and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.47 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDS vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDS
NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

TARK
TARK Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TARK Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
TARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TARK Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDS vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDSTARKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.06

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.85

0.03

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.41

0.05

-1.46

NVDS vs. TARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.90, which is lower than the TARK Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and TARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than TARK's maximum drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and TARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDSTARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.40%

-77.82%

-21.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.48%

-57.57%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-95.90%

-65.55%

-30.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.25%

-41.07%

-58.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.59%

-50.80%

-32.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.37%

30.71%

+5.66%

Volatility

NVDS vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 20.03%, while Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) has a volatility of 24.92%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDSTARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.03%

24.92%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.67%

53.17%

-12.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.16%

71.40%

-18.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.89%

90.67%

-21.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.89%

90.67%

-21.78%

NVDS vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both NVDS and TARK have an expense ratio of 1.15%.


Dividends

NVDS vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.42%, less than TARK's 33.49% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
NVDS
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF
17.42%14.19%14.11%14.69%5.72%
TARK
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
33.49%30.00%0.59%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDS and TARK have a correlation of -0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TARK has higher volatility (24.92%) compared to NVDS (20.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs TARK's -77.82%.

On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 18.03% vs -62.36% for NVDS. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 20.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 18.03% return vs -62.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDS and TARK have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

TARK has the higher dividend yield at 33.49%, compared with 17.42% for NVDS.

NVDS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TARK is Leveraged Equities.

TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.02 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDS and TARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer