NVDS vs. TARK
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and TARK (Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while TARK is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS. NVDS is passively managed, while TARK is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -65.20%/yr vs 22.58%/yr for TARK. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.
Performance
NVDS vs. TARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -29.31% return, which is significantly lower than TARK's -1.67% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- -17.63%
- YTD
- -29.31%
- 6M
- -32.74%
- 1Y
- -58.02%
- 3Y*
- -65.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TARK
- 1D
- -3.51%
- 1M
- 6.42%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -5.56%
- 1Y
- 58.98%
- 3Y*
- 22.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDS vs. TARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -29.31% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -14.84% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | -1.67% | 41.00% | -4.85% | 121.37% | -57.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and TARK is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2022 | -0.52 |
The correlation between NVDS and TARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.43 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. TARK — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
TARK
NVDS vs. TARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| NVDS | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | 0.83 | -1.97 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.91 | 1.50 | -3.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.17 | -0.39 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.97 | 1.11 | -2.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.53 | 2.19 | -3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| NVDS | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.14 | 0.83 | -1.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.03 | -0.07 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. TARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than TARK's maximum drawdown of -77.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and TARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -77.82% | -21.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.88% | -57.57% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.32% | -65.55% | -30.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.35% | -35.30% | -64.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.38% | -51.00% | -32.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 38.60% | 29.21% | +9.39% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. TARK - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) have volatilities of 18.32% and 17.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | TARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.32% | 17.93% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.28% | 50.05% | -11.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.88% | 71.71% | -20.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 90.60% | -21.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.85% | 90.60% | -21.75% |
NVDS vs. TARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both NVDS and TARK have an expense ratio of 1.15%.
Dividends
NVDS vs. TARK - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.07%, less than TARK's 30.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 20.07% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% |
TARK Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF | 30.51% | 30.00% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and TARK have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.32%) compared to TARK (17.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs TARK's -77.82%.
On 3-year performance, TARK leads with 22.58% vs -65.20% for NVDS. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, TARK has been the lower-risk option at 17.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TARK has performed better with a 22.58% return vs -65.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDS and TARK have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.
TARK has the higher dividend yield at 30.51%, compared with 20.07% for NVDS.
NVDS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while TARK is Leveraged Equities.
TARK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and TARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer