NVDS vs. QBTX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and QBTX (Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while QBTX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by AXS. NVDS is passively managed, while QBTX is actively managed. Over the past year, NVDS returned -35.38% vs -61.08% for QBTX. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QBTX.

Performance

NVDS vs. QBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly higher than QBTX's -72.07% return.

NVDS

• 1D: -4.24%
• 1M: -10.37%
• 6M: -24.26%
• YTD: -24.21%
• 1Y: -35.38%
• 3Y*: -62.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -68.81%

QBTX

• 1D: 20.94%
• 1M: -30.26%
• 6M: -53.31%
• YTD: -72.07%
• 1Y: -61.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	$5.22M	$5.62M	$7.37M
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	$19.15M	$16.36M	$40.69M

NVDS vs. QBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	-24.21%	-60.45%
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	-72.07%	339.28%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDS and QBTX is -0.27, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 25, 2025	-0.25

Return for Risk

NVDS vs. QBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDS

NVDS Risk / Return Rank: 3
NVDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
NVDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
NVDS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
NVDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
NVDS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QBTX

QBTX Risk / Return Rank: 13
QBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
QBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
QBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
QBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDS vs. QBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDS	QBTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.65	-0.28	-0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.73	1.01	-1.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.11	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	-0.64	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.44	-0.81	-0.63

NVDS vs. QBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDS Sharpe Ratio is -0.65, which is lower than the QBTX Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDS and QBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDS vs. QBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTX drawdown of -95.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and QBTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDS	QBTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-95.48%	-3.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-47.10%	-95.48%	+48.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-95.83%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.31%	-93.55%	-5.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-84.02%	-60.45%	-23.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.60%	75.02%	-50.42%

Volatility

NVDS vs. QBTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) is 18.42%, while Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF (QBTX) has a volatility of 61.09%. This indicates that NVDS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDS	QBTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.42%	61.09%	-42.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.03%	149.71%	-106.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.77%	220.82%	-166.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	68.61%	238.21%	-169.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	68.61%	238.21%	-169.60%

NVDS vs. QBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QBTX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDS vs. QBTX - Dividend Comparison

NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, less than QBTX's 47.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF	18.72%	14.19%	14.11%	14.69%	5.72%
QBTX Tradr 2X Long QBTS Daily ETF	47.24%	13.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDS and QBTX in my portfolio?

NVDS and QBTX have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDS or QBTX?

QBTX has higher volatility (61.09%) compared to NVDS (18.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs QBTX's -95.48%.

Which ETF is better, NVDS or QBTX?

On 1-year performance, NVDS leads with -35.38% vs -61.08% for QBTX. On fees, NVDS is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, NVDS has been the lower-risk option at 18.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDS or QBTX?

Over the 1-year period, NVDS has performed better with a -35.38% return vs -61.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDS or QBTX?

NVDS is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QBTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDS or QBTX?

QBTX has the higher dividend yield at 47.24%, compared with 18.72% for NVDS.

What is the main difference between NVDS and QBTX?

NVDS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QBTX is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 1.30% for QBTX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QBTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.28 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.