NVDS vs. IUSG
NVDS (Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF) and IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - NVDS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 900 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, NVDS returned -62.25%/yr vs 25.35%/yr for IUSG. Their -0.75 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. NVDS charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IUSG.
Performance
NVDS vs. IUSG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDS achieves a -24.21% return, which is significantly lower than IUSG's 12.72% return.
NVDS
- 1D
- -4.24%
- 1M
- -10.37%
- 6M
- -24.26%
- YTD
- -24.21%
- 1Y
- -35.38%
- 3Y*
- -62.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -68.81%
IUSG
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- YTD
- 12.72%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 13.30%
- 10Y*
- 17.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $105.73M | $92.27M | $99.82M | |
| $5.22M | $5.62M | $7.37M |
NVDS vs. IUSG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | -24.21% | -58.18% | -80.03% | -83.15% | -16.72% |
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 12.72% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDS and IUSG is -0.74, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022 | -0.75 |
The correlation between NVDS and IUSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.75 to -0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDS vs. IUSG — Risk / Return Rank
NVDS
IUSG
NVDS vs. IUSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.24 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 1.88 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.44 | 6.96 | -8.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDS vs. IUSG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDS drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than IUSG's maximum drawdown of -63.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDS and IUSG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -63.41% | -35.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.10% | -13.07% | -34.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.83% | -22.28% | -73.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | -2.17% | -97.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -84.02% | -21.33% | -62.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.60% | 3.52% | +21.08% |
Volatility
NVDS vs. IUSG - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF (NVDS) has a higher volatility of 18.42% compared to iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) at 6.24%. This indicates that NVDS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDS | IUSG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.42% | 6.24% | +12.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.03% | 14.68% | +28.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.77% | 17.84% | +36.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 21.22% | +47.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.61% | 20.55% | +48.06% |
NVDS vs. IUSG - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDS has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDS vs. IUSG - Dividend Comparison
NVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.72%, more than IUSG's 0.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.49% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
NVDS Tradr 1.25X NVDA Bear Daily ETF | 18.72% | 14.19% | 14.11% | 14.69% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDS and IUSG have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDS has higher volatility (18.42%) compared to IUSG (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDS dropped -99.40% vs IUSG's -63.41%.
On 3-year performance, IUSG leads with 25.35% vs -62.25% for NVDS. On fees, IUSG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 6.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 25.35% return vs -62.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for NVDS.
NVDS has the higher dividend yield at 18.72%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.
NVDS is categorized as Inverse Equities, while IUSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. NVDS tracks NVIDIA Corporation (-125%), while IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for NVDS and 0.04% for IUSG.
IUSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDS and IUSG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer