NVDL vs. MSFL

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) and MSFL (GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, NVDL returned 19.05% vs -27.73% for MSFL. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. NVDL charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for MSFL.

Performance

NVDL vs. MSFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDL achieves a 19.13% return, which is significantly higher than MSFL's -10.95% return.

NVDL

• 1D: 6.85%
• 1M: 22.50%
• 6M: 38.93%
• YTD: 19.13%
• 1Y: 19.05%
• 3Y*: 97.81%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 146.14%

MSFL

• 1D: -2.30%
• 1M: 53.42%
• 6M: 24.41%
• YTD: -10.95%
• 1Y: -27.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -1.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	$45.44M	$34.15M	$35.32M
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	$380.97M	$415.87M	$666.11M

NVDL vs. MSFL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	19.13%	32.57%	67.36%
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	-10.95%	16.99%	-8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDL and MSFL is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2024	0.45

The correlation between NVDL and MSFL shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.45 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NVDL vs. MSFL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	NVDL	MSFL
Financial Services	100.0%	-
Technology	100.0%	66.7%
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Utilities	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

NVDL vs. MSFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

NVDL

NVDL Risk / Return Rank: 18
NVDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
NVDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
NVDL Omega Ratio Rank: 21
NVDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
NVDL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

MSFL

MSFL Risk / Return Rank: 6
MSFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MSFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MSFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSFL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

NVDL vs. MSFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	NVDL	MSFL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	-0.44	+0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	-0.31	+1.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	0.96	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	-0.45	+0.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	-0.74	+1.62

NVDL vs. MSFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDL Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is higher than the MSFL Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDL and MSFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

NVDL vs. MSFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDL drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, which is greater than MSFL's maximum drawdown of -62.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDL and MSFL.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDL	MSFL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-67.55%	-62.08%	-5.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.23%	-62.08%	+19.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-67.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.75%	-30.61%	+11.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.47%	-23.71%	+6.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.78%	37.35%	-15.57%

Volatility

NVDL vs. MSFL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL) is 25.53%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF (MSFL) has a volatility of 30.74%. This indicates that NVDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDL	MSFL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.53%	30.74%	-5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.52%	51.82%	+4.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.65%	63.39%	+9.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.01%	54.61%	+35.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.01%	54.61%	+35.40%

NVDL vs. MSFL - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDL has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFL's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

NVDL vs. MSFL - Dividend Comparison

Neither NVDL nor MSFL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MSFL GraniteShares 2x Long MSFT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	11.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both NVDL and MSFL in my portfolio?

NVDL and MSFL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, NVDL or MSFL?

MSFL has higher volatility (30.74%) compared to NVDL (25.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDL dropped -67.55% vs MSFL's -62.08%.

Which ETF is better, NVDL or MSFL?

On 1-year performance, NVDL leads with 19.05% vs -27.73% for MSFL. On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, NVDL has been the lower-risk option at 25.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, NVDL or MSFL?

Over the 1-year period, NVDL has performed better with a 19.05% return vs -27.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, NVDL or MSFL?

NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for MSFL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, NVDL or MSFL?

NVDL and MSFL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between NVDL and MSFL?

Their fees differ too: 1.05% for NVDL and 1.15% for MSFL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NVDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.26 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.