PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDG vs. QTAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDG vs. QTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDG achieves a 18.93% return, which is significantly higher than QTAP's 14.67% return.


NVDG

1D
-7.35%
1M
14.07%
YTD
18.93%
6M
26.05%
1Y
83.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QTAP

1D
-0.10%
1M
2.89%
YTD
14.67%
6M
15.56%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
13.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDG vs. QTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NVDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF
18.93%32.45%-0.75%
QTAP
Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April
14.67%19.36%-0.77%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDG and QTAP is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.61

The correlation between NVDG and QTAP shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDG vs. QTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDG
NVDG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NVDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDG Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDG Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QTAP
QTAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QTAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QTAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QTAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
QTAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QTAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDG vs. QTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) and Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDGQTAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

2.23

-1.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

15.20

-13.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

80.04

-75.60

NVDG vs. QTAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the QTAP Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDG and QTAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDGQTAPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

4.62

-3.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.75

-0.35

Drawdowns

NVDG vs. QTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDG drawdown since its inception was -66.19%, which is greater than QTAP's maximum drawdown of -29.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG and QTAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDGQTAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.19%

-29.44%

-36.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.72%

-1.69%

-41.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.34%

-0.10%

-18.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.07%

-5.04%

-18.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.77%

0.32%

+18.45%

Volatility

NVDG vs. QTAP - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDG) has a higher volatility of 25.14% compared to Innovator Growth Accelerated Plus ETF - April (QTAP) at 1.33%. This indicates that NVDG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDGQTAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.14%

1.33%

+23.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.15%

3.97%

+46.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

67.81%

5.56%

+62.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.72%

18.89%

+71.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.72%

18.77%

+71.95%

NVDG vs. QTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QTAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDG vs. QTAP - Dividend Comparison

NVDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.93%, while QTAP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


NVDG and QTAP have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDG has higher volatility (25.14%) compared to QTAP (1.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDG dropped -66.19% vs QTAP's -29.44%.

On 1-year performance, NVDG leads with 83.14% vs 25.59% for QTAP. On fees, NVDG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QTAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDG has performed better with a 83.14% return vs 25.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QTAP.

NVDG has the higher dividend yield at 9.93%, compared with 0.00% for QTAP.

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for NVDG and 0.79% for QTAP.

QTAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDG and QTAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer