NVDG.F vs. CRWV

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV).

Performance

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR	-3.47%	57.95%
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	16.92%	65.20%

Different Trading Currencies

NVDG.F is traded in EUR, while CRWV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CRWV values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDG.F achieves a -3.47% return, which is significantly lower than CRWV's 16.92% return.

NVDG.F

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: -3.47%
• 6M: -5.65%
• 1Y: 54.35%
• 3Y*: 78.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRWV

• 1D: 5.32%
• 1M: 12.19%
• YTD: 16.92%
• 6M: -39.46%
• 1Y: 25.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NVDG.F vs. CRWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDG.F

NVDG.F Risk / Return Rank: 76
NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NVDG.F Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
NVDG.F Omega Ratio Rank: 68
NVDG.F Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
NVDG.F Martin Ratio Rank: 81

CRWV

CRWV Risk / Return Rank: 56
CRWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
CRWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
CRWV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
CRWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
CRWV Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) and CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVDG.F	CRWV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.23	+0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.70	1.18	+0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.14	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	0.71	+2.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.00	1.10	+5.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDG.F Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the CRWV Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDG.F and CRWV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVDG.F	CRWV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.23	+0.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	0.77	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between NVDG.F and CRWV is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Dividend Comparison

NVDG.F's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, while CRWV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
NVDG.F NVIDIA Corporation CDR	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.08%
CRWV CoreWeave, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDG.F drawdown since its inception was -60.32%, smaller than the maximum CRWV drawdown of -65.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDG.F and CRWV.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVDG.F	CRWV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.32%	-64.84%	+4.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.33%	-64.84%	+44.51%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.25%	-55.20%	+39.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.88%	-36.76%	+19.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.06%	41.30%	-32.24%

Volatility

NVDG.F vs. CRWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation CDR (NVDG.F) is 12.86%, while CoreWeave, Inc. (CRWV) has a volatility of 24.07%. This indicates that NVDG.F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVDG.F	CRWV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.86%	24.07%	-11.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.30%	66.71%	-33.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.84%	112.44%	-64.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.71%	119.69%	-56.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.71%	119.69%	-56.98%

Financials