NVDB vs. XTJL
NVDB (ProShares Ultra NVDA) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. NVDB is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. NVDB charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.
Performance
NVDB vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than XTJL's 6.36% return.
NVDB
- 1D
- 7.86%
- 1M
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 13.85%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XTJL
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.53%
- YTD
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 14.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- —
NVDB vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 11.22% | 1.98% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 6.36% | 3.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDB and XTJL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDB vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank
NVDB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XTJL
NVDB vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDB | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.43 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDB vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and XTJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDB | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.89% | -23.24% | -19.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.47% | 0.00% | -23.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.82% | -3.96% | -15.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
NVDB vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDB | XTJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.68% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.49% | 7.36% | +66.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.49% | 15.09% | +58.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 73.49% | 15.07% | +58.42% |
NVDB vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
NVDB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
NVDB vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison
NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while XTJL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDB ProShares Ultra NVDA | 1.45% | 0.55% |
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDB and XTJL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NVDB.
NVDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for XTJL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NVDB and 0.79% for XTJL.
Find the right allocation for NVDB and XTJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer