PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDB vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NVDB vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDB achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.93% return.


NVDB

1D
-11.96%
1M
-4.46%
YTD
8.52%
6M
12.10%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
-0.97%
1M
4.09%
YTD
-3.93%
6M
-4.23%
1Y
1.73%
3Y*
16.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDB vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
NVDB
ProShares Ultra NVDA
8.52%2.15%
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
-3.93%1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDB and IFED is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDB vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDB

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDB vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra NVDA (NVDB) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

NVDB vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDBIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.64

-0.44

Drawdowns

NVDB vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDB drawdown since its inception was -42.89%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDB and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDBIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.89%

-22.36%

-20.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.33%

-5.89%

-19.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-5.84%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

Volatility

NVDB vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDBIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.10%

16.21%

+57.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.10%

19.87%

+54.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.10%

19.87%

+54.23%

NVDB vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

NVDB has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

NVDB vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

NVDB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
IFED
ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN
0.00%0.00%
NVDB
ProShares Ultra NVDA
1.00%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDB and IFED have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for NVDB.

NVDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for IFED.

NVDB tracks NVIDIA Corporation, while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for NVDB and 0.45% for IFED.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDB and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer