NVDA vs. XLM-USD
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock, while XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency. Over the past 10 years, NVDA returned 67.95%/yr vs 60.23%/yr for XLM-USD. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
NVDA vs. XLM-USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than XLM-USD's -6.87% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed XLM-USD with an annualized return of 67.95%, while XLM-USD has yielded a comparatively lower 60.23% annualized return.
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -12.86%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 44.72%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
NVDA vs. XLM-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | 108.68% | 184.76% | -60.36% | -68.37% | 14,396.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between NVDA and XLM-USD is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2014 | 0.11 |
The correlation between NVDA and XLM-USD shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (all time) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NVDA vs. XLM-USD — Risk / Return Rank
NVDA
XLM-USD
NVDA vs. XLM-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Stellar (XLM-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NVDA | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.00 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | -0.40 | +2.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | -0.57 | +5.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NVDA vs. XLM-USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum XLM-USD drawdown of -96.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and XLM-USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NVDA | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.72% | -96.21% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.21% | -71.19% | +50.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.88% | -74.37% | +37.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.34% | -83.25% | +16.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.34% | -96.21% | +29.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -78.80% | +65.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.18% | -72.14% | +35.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.46% | 50.48% | -42.02% |
Volatility
NVDA vs. XLM-USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.26%, while Stellar (XLM-USD) has a volatility of 43.48%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLM-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NVDA | XLM-USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.26% | 43.48% | -30.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.67% | 59.28% | -32.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.00% | 70.60% | -35.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.76% | 74.72% | -22.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.84% | 112.79% | -62.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NVDA and XLM-USD have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs XLM-USD's -96.21%.
NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NVDA and XLM-USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer