PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. SMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. SMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 10.16% return, which is significantly higher than SMR's -30.20% return.


NVDA

1D
0.16%
1M
-9.03%
YTD
10.16%
6M
17.38%
1Y
41.70%
3Y*
71.13%
5Y*
63.13%
10Y*
67.95%

SMR

1D
3.34%
1M
-17.31%
YTD
-30.20%
6M
-46.07%
1Y
-75.51%
3Y*
5.43%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. SMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
10.16%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%-2.21%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
-30.20%-20.97%444.98%-67.93%2.29%-0.89%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and SMR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.22

The correlation between NVDA and SMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (5 years) to 0.33 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NVDA:

$5.00T

SMR:

$3.16B

EPS

NVDA:

$6.53

SMR:

-$2.02

PS Ratio

NVDA:

19.80

SMR:

104.42

PB Ratio

NVDA:

25.60

SMR:

2.71

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

SMR:

$18.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

SMR:

$4.45M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

SMR:

-$696.20M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. SMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

SMR
SMR Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMR Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. SMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and NuScale Power Corporation (SMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


NVDASMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.87

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

-0.91

+2.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

-1.32

+6.26

NVDA vs. SMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the SMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and SMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. SMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, roughly equal to the maximum SMR drawdown of -87.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and SMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDASMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-87.47%

-2.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-82.86%

+62.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-82.86%

+45.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-87.47%

+21.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.86%

-81.49%

+68.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.18%

-35.08%

-1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.46%

57.39%

-48.93%

Volatility

NVDA vs. SMR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is 13.26%, while NuScale Power Corporation (SMR) has a volatility of 28.93%. This indicates that NVDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDASMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.26%

28.93%

-15.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.67%

69.57%

-42.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.00%

102.59%

-67.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.76%

93.50%

-41.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.84%

89.31%

-39.47%

Dividends

NVDA vs. SMR - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while SMR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
SMR
NuScale Power Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

NVDA vs. SMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and NuScale Power Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
0
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(SMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and SMR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMR has higher volatility (28.93%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs SMR's -87.47%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and SMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer