PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NVDA vs. IMMR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

NVDA vs. IMMR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVDA achieves a 12.01% return, which is significantly higher than IMMR's 0.39% return. Over the past 10 years, NVDA has outperformed IMMR with an annualized return of 68.47%, while IMMR has yielded a comparatively lower 1.41% annualized return.


NVDA

1D
1.73%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.58%
1Y
47.43%
3Y*
75.35%
5Y*
64.54%
10Y*
68.47%

IMMR

1D
4.71%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
0.39%
6M
-3.03%
1Y
-10.21%
3Y*
-2.01%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NVDA vs. IMMR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
12.01%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
0.39%-18.30%26.47%3.43%23.12%-49.42%51.95%-17.08%26.91%-33.58%

Correlation

The correlation between NVDA and IMMR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 1999

0.27

The correlation between NVDA and IMMR shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM)

NVDA:

$253.49B

IMMR:

$1.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NVDA:

$187.95B

IMMR:

$409.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

NVDA:

$192.76B

IMMR:

$188.76M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NVDA vs. IMMR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

IMMR
IMMR Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
IMMR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMMR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMMR Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IMMR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMMR Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVDA vs. IMMR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NVDAIMMRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.99

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

-0.33

+2.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.73

-0.61

+6.34

NVDA vs. IMMR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVDA Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the IMMR Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVDA and IMMR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NVDAIMMRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

-0.26

+1.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

-0.08

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.38

0.03

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

-0.04

+0.67

Drawdowns

NVDA vs. IMMR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVDA drawdown since its inception was -89.72%, smaller than the maximum IMMR drawdown of -98.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVDA and IMMR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NVDAIMMRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.72%

-98.66%

+8.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.21%

-30.86%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.88%

-56.90%

+20.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.34%

-56.90%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-74.29%

+7.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.39%

-89.65%

+78.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-88.21%

+52.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.30%

16.77%

-8.47%

Volatility

NVDA vs. IMMR - Volatility Comparison

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) and Immersion Corporation (IMMR) have volatilities of 13.14% and 12.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NVDAIMMRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.14%

12.61%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.37%

27.21%

-0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.81%

39.79%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.75%

45.83%

+5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.85%

51.32%

-1.47%

Dividends

NVDA vs. IMMR - Dividend Comparison

NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than IMMR's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
3.60%5.59%2.06%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.14%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

NVDA vs. IMMR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVIDIA Corporation and Immersion Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
81.62B
281.38M
(NVDA) Total Revenue
(IMMR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


NVDA and IMMR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDA has higher volatility (13.14%) compared to IMMR (12.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NVDA dropped -89.72% vs IMMR's -98.66%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NVDA and IMMR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer